Method of Calculation of Integrated Performance Indicators of Defense Industry Organizations

The purpose of the study is to develop a parametric monitoring system for defense industry enterprises, optimizing on the principle of minimum sufficiency a set of key indicators of the activities of organizations and increasing the efficiency of management of research institutes, design bureaus, industrial and service enterprises of the military-industrial complex.

Materials and methods. The methodological and theoretical basis of the presented scientific work is a system of mathematical methods for analyzing empirical data on the object of study, providing objective, accurate and systematic information on the researched processes. The reliability of scientific provisions, conclusions and practical recommendations is confirmed by the experience of applying the results of the study in the analysis of the activities of enterprises of Concern Almaz-Antey JSC, as well as comparing them with the results of research by domestic and foreign scientists in the field of organizing a management system for high-tech companies. Author relied on actual statistical information about the activities of organizations of the military-industrial complex, the results of research in the field of mathematical analysis, organization and planning of machine-building production, research of operations, rank statistics, probability theory, theory of adaptive management, economics and enterprise management.

Results. A method has been developed for processing data on the activities of enterprises and reducing them to the optimal set of observed indicators without losing awareness of the monitoring object; possibilities of using non-parametric methods of statistics for analysis of complex systems, in particular, holdings of defense industry, have been researched.

Conclusion. Each enterprise has its own specificity depending on the specifics of the production processes. There is now a significant number of different indicators that comprehensively, and often too extensively, characterize what is happening. This situation often makes it difficult to manage production facilities, since the actual picture of the state of the facilities is obscured by an excess of secondary information. In this regard, it seems reasonable to try to weed out unnecessary indicators and use only those that carry the necessary amount of information sufficient to reflect the specifics of the enterprise. The presented work theoretically and practically proved the advantages of using non-parametric statistics in enterprise monitoring, which allows reducing temporary losses in the development of management solutions and increasing their efficiency at the level of the parent companies of defense-industrial associations.

1. Men’shchikov V.V. Kontsern PVO «Almaz Antey» v usloviyakh rynochnoy ekonomiki = Concern Air Defense “Almaz Antey” in a market economy. Moscow: Granitsa; 2006. 64 p. (In Russ.)

2. Men’shchikov V.V. Air Defense Concern and Russia’s Military Security in Aerospace. KHKHKHIV Voyenno-nauchnaya konferentsiya «Organizatsiya sistemy vozdushno-kosmicheskoy oborony RF»: Doklad = XXXIV Military Scientific Conference “Organization of the RF Aerospace Defense System”: Report. Tver; 2005; inv. 574436: 88-96.

3. Men’shchikov V.V. Methodological approach to assessing the reliability of defense industry enterprises. KHKHKHIV Voyenno-nauchnaya konferentsiya «Organizatsiya sistemy vozdushno-kosmicheskoy oborony RF» = XXXIV Military-scientific conference “Organization of the aerospace defense system of the Russian Federation”. Tver; 2005; Inv. 574436: 97-102.

4. Men’shchikov V.V. Mechanisms and methods of corporate governance of the defense industry concern. Radio promyshlennost’ = Radio industry. 2006; 2: 30-39.

5. Novikov Ya.V. On the path of modern conversion. Ekonomicheskiye strategii = Economic strategies. 2016; 7: 70-74.

6. Novikov Ya.V. Functioning and development of the defense industry complex in conditions of modern challenges. Vestnik Kontserna PVO «Almaz-Antey» = Bulletin of the Air Defense Concern “Almaz-Antey”. 2015; 3: 5-10.

7. Omel’chenko I.N., Mukhortov D.P. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley kak instrument strategicheskogo upravleniya na predpriyatiyakh OPK =. Balanced Scorecard as a Tool of Strategic Management at Defense Industry Enterprises. 2007; 7: 23-28.

8. Brom A.Ye., Kolobov A.A., Omel’chenko I.N. Integrirovannaya logisticheskaya podderzhka zhiznennogo tsikla naukoyemkoy produktsii / Pod red. A.A. Kolobova = Integrated logistics support for the life cycle of high technology products / Ed. A.A. Kolobov. Moscow: MGTU im. N.E. Bauman; 2008: 295-296.

9. Inzhenernaya ekonomika: Uchebnik / V.V. Kochetov, A.A. Kolobov, I.N. Omel’chenko; Pod red. A.A. Kolobova, A.I. Orlova = Engineering Economics: Textbook / V.V. Kochetov, A.A. Kolobov, I.N. Omelchenko; Ed. A.A. Kolobov, A.I. Orlova. Moscow: MGTU im. N.E. Bauman; 2005. 668 p.

10. Kolobov, A.A. Menedzhment vysokikh tekhnologiy: uchebnoye posobiye / A.A. Kolobov, I.N. Omel’chenko, A.I. Orlov = Management of high technologies: a tutorial / A.A. Kolobov, I.N. Omelchenko, A.I. Orlov. Moscow: INTUIT; 2016. 920 p.

11. Yeroshin S.Ye., Kozlov G.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of researchers in various sectors of science. Ekonomicheskiye strategii = Economic strategies. 2016; 18; 2(136): 116-123.

12. Yeremeyev A.P. Ekspertnyye modeli i metody prinyatiya resheniy = Expert models and decision-making methods. Moscow: MEI; 1995.

13. Men’shchikov V.V., Kozlov G.V., Yeroshin S.Ye. Method of constructing a rating system of assessments. Vestnik mashinostroyeniya = Vestnik mashinostroeniya. 2007; 9: 73-76.

14. Ageyev A.I., Galushkina M.V., Kopkova Ye.S., Smirnova V.A., Shtukel’berger K. Integrirovannaya otchetnost’: vyzov menedzhmentu = Integrated reporting: a challenge to management. Moscow: Institut ekonomicheskikh strategiy, Natsional’nyy tsentr nauchno-tekhnicheskoy informatsii = Institute for Economic Strategies, National Center for Scientific and Technical Information; 2016. 212 p.

15. Ageyev A.I. et. al. Metodika otsenki strategicheskogo potentsiala obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdeniy = Methodology for assessing the strategic potential of educational institutions. Moscow: Institute for Economic Strategies; 2005. 32 p.

16. Aleksandrov L.V., Karpova N.N. Rabochaya kniga po sistematizatsii informatsii= A workbook for organizing information. Moscow: 1993.

17. Bugrov D. Metric of efficiency. Vestnik McKinsey = Bulletin McKinsey. 2003; 1: 3.

18. Kozak N. Balanced system of evaluative indicators as a tool for business management. Upravleniye kompaniyey = Company management. 2004; 1: 1-2.

19. Litvak B.G. Ekspertnyye otsenki i prinyatiye resheniy = Expert judgment and decision making. Moscow: PP “Patent”; 1996. 271 p.

20. Litvak B.G. Ekspertnyye tekhnologii v upravlenii = Expert technologies in management. Moscow: Delo; 2004. 398 p.

21. Men’shchikov V.V. Concern PVO “Almaz-Antey”, formation and development paths. Ekonomicheskiye strategii = Economic strategies. 2005; 7: 56-61.

22. Men’shchikov V.V. Formation of integrated structures strategy of strengthening the country’s defense. Voyennyy parad = Military parade. 2006; 2: 60-62.

23. Omel’chenko I.N. Strategicheskoye upravleniye organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoy ustoychivost’yu firmy. Logistikooriyentirovannoye proyektirovaniye biznesa = Strategic management of organizational and economic stability of the company. Logistics-oriented business design. Moscow: MGTU im. Bauman;, 2001. 600 p. (co-authored).