Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Information and communication technologies as a basis for the development of the information society: Russia in the system of international statistical indicators

https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2019-1-32-40

Abstract

The purpose of the study. The first goal of the study is a comparative analysis of general indicators of information and communication technologies (ICT) development and the principles of their construction, identifying the possibilities of their use for cross-country comparisons. The second goal is cross-country comparisons based on selected indicators and an assessment of the place and prospects of Russia in the context of ICT development. The objectives of the study are due to the growing worldwide interest of the international scientific community, business and government structures to the development of information and communication technologies and the formation of the information society. The Okinawa Charter on the Global Information Society, adopted in 2000, states that information and communication technologies in the 21st century will be one of the most powerful forces and their impact will change people’s lifestyles, ways of learning and working, as well as ways and possibilities for governments to interact with citizens. In this regard, the actual issue is the formation of an adequate information base for studying information and communication technologies not only as an independent object, but also as the most important factor in the formation of the functioning of the digital economy and the formation of the information society.

Materials and methods. For the study, the methods of multidimensional classification, analysis of variation, as well as a tabular method of visual presentation of the research results were used as statistical tools. For the processing of primary information, application packages of statistical analysis were used: Microsoft Excel and STATISTICA 10.0.

Results. Comparison of the indicators revealed the need for their further structuring in order to ensure the comparability of statistical analysis for the largest possible set of countries. Comparison of countries and assessment of the place of Russia was carried out on the basis of the proposed system of indicators using the methods of multidimensional classification, analysis of distributions and studying the dynamics of the indicators. The variety of tasks solved in the study of information and communication technologies and their components predetermined the presence of a large number of generalizing indicators used in cross-country comparisons, as well as a variety of approaches, both to building indicators themselves, and to forming data collection systems that ensure their calculation and comparisons. Considerable scientific and practical interest is the formation of a system of statistical indicators of ICT development, providing multi-level comparability at both country and national levels.

Conclusion. According to the results of a statistical research, Russia’s positions on the accessibility infrastructure characteristics and the use of information and communication technologies are revealed. The country’s lagging behind in terms of the development of both physical and information infrastructure not only from economically developed countries, but also from some BRICS and CIS countries, overcoming of which will make it possible to solve the tasks defined by the Information Society Development Strategy of the country.

About the Authors

Svetlana G. Bychkova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Professor, Professor of the Department of Marketing Services and Brand Management


Lidiya S. Parshintseva
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Statistics


References

1. Inesnet.ru [Internet] Available from: http:// www.inesnet.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Worl d0developm0l0dividends0overview.pdf

2. Tapscott D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996.

3. Rouse M. Digital Economy. Newton: Techtarget. [Internet] Available from: http:// searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/digital-economy

4. Knickrehm M., Berthon B., Daugherty P. Digital Disruption: The Growth Multiplier. Dublin: Accenture. [Internet] Available from: https://www. accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-4/AccentureStrategy-Digital- Disruption-Growth-Multiplier.pdf

5. Kling R., Lamb R. IT and Organizational Change in Digital Economies. Understanding the Digital Economy. E. Brynjolfsson, B. Kahin (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press, MA; 2000.

6. Kotarba M. Measuring Digitalization – Key Metrics Foundation of Management? 2017; 9: 123– 130.

7. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research. E. Brynjolfsson, B. Kahin (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press; 2000.

8. Strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030, approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 9; 2017 No. 203 “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030(In Russ.)

9. State program of the Russian Federation “Information Society (2011–2020)”. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 15; 2014 N 313. (In Russ.)

10. The program «Digital Economy of the Russian Federation.» Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 28; 2017 No. 1632-p (In Russ.)

11. Arkhipova M.YU., Sirotin V.P., Sukhareva N.A. Development of a composite indicator for measuring the magnitude and dynamics of digital inequality in Russia. Voprosy statistiki = Questions of statistics. 2018; 4: 75–87. (In Russ.)

12. Dronov V. N., Makhrova O. N. TSifrovoye neravenstvo Ryazanskoy oblasti: monografiya = Digital Inequality of the Ryazan Region: monograph. Saint Petersburg.: Izdatel’stvo SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta upravleniya i ekonomiki = Publishing House of the St. Petersburg University of Management and Economics; 2015. (In Russ.)

13. Trofimova I.N. BRICS and rapidly developing countries on the way to the information society: ICT development and digital inequality. Voprosy statistiki = Questions of statistics. 2013; 10: 41-53. (In Russ.)

14. E-government 2018. The use of e-government to create a sustainable and flexible society. New York: United Nations; 2018.

15. ICT Prices International Telecommunication Union. Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva: Switzerland; 2018

16. Ec.europa.eu [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi

17. Itu.int [Internet] Available from: https://www. itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/ mis2017/methodology.aspx

18. Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2018.

19. Thewebindex.org [Internet] Available from: https://thewebindex.org/data/?indicator=ITU_G

20. The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2018

21. Cloudscene.com [Electron. resource] Access mode: https://cloudscene.com/


Review

For citations:


Bychkova S.G., Parshintseva L.S. Information and communication technologies as a basis for the development of the information society: Russia in the system of international statistical indicators. Statistics and Economics. 2019;16(1):32-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2019-1-32-40

Views: 1546


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)