Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Comparative Assessment of the Human Capital Impact on the Population Income in the European and Asian Regions of Russia

https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/2500-3925-2023-2-41-50

Abstract

The relevance of the study is explained by the link between economic growth and investment in human capital.

The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the dynamics of the return of physical and human capital in the European and Asian regions of Russia.

Materials and methods. In the article, the authors use the extended Cobb-Douglas production function and conduct a regression spatial analysis based on data of the official Russian statistics.

Results. There are estimates of the relationship between the income of the population of regions with the number of employed, with the volume of fixed assets of regions and human capital; the wage fund of the population of regions with the number of employed, with the volume of fixed assets of regions and human capital, the elasticity coefficients are justified. The authors analyzed and interpreted the values of the elasticity coefficients. In particular, the coefficients of elasticity of household income by fixed assets for Asian and European regions tend to decrease; the authors explain this by the low level of investment in the renewal of fixed capital at enterprises. The coefficients of elasticity of income of the population by the number of people employed in the economy of the regions are noticeably higher and tend to increase. At the same time, human capital has a stronger impact on the income of the population than fixed assets and the number of people employed in the economy of the regions. There is a decrease in the influence of human capital on the income of the population in the group of European regions of Russia at the end of the period under review and the relative stability of its returns in the Asian group of regions.

Conclusion. The impact of human capital on the income of the population differs significantly in the European and Asian regions of Russia. The authors identified efficiency trends and features of the use of the main factors of production in different groups of regions of the Russian Federation in the period under review. Scientific significance is the generalization of knowledge about the role of human capital in economic development, technology transfer and increasing the investment attractiveness of settlements and regions due to it; obtaining statistically significant models for assessing the economic return of human capital.

About the Authors

A. A. Aletdinova
Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas
Russian Federation

Anna A. Aletdinova – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor 

Moscow



A. V. Koritskiy
Siberian Universityof Consumer Cooperation
Russian Federation

Aleksey V. Koritskiy – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department Economic Theory and Applied Economics

Novosibirsk



A. N. Shadrintseva
Siberian Universityof Consumer Cooperation
Russian Federation

Anna N. Shadrintseva – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Entrepreneurship

Novosibirsk



References

1. Aganbegyan A.G. Investments in fixed capital and investments in human capital two interrelated sources of socio-economic growth. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting. 2017; 4(163): 17-30. (In Russ.)

2. Aletdinova A.A., Koritskiy A.V. Comparative analysis of the return of human capital in the European and Asian regions of Russia. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology. 2019; 3(103): 143-163. (In Russ.)

3. Belokonnaya L., Gimpel’son V. Ye., Gorbacheva T., Zhikhareva O., Kapelyushnikov R., Luk’yanova A. Formation of wages: a view through the prism of professions. Voprosy ekonomiki = Questions of Economics. 2007; 10: 52-74. (In Russ.)

4. Bilyak T. A., Vishnevskaya N. T., Gimpel’son V. Ye., Denisova I. A., Kapelyushnikov R. I., Karabchuk T. S., Tsukhlo S. V. Rossiyskiy rabotnik: obrazovaniye, professiya, kvalifikatsiya = Russian worker: education, profession, qualification. Moscow: Ed. house HSE; 2011. 574 p. (In Russ.)

5. Gimpel’son V.Ye., Kapelyushnikov R.I. Zarabotnaya plata v Rossii: evolyutsiya i differentsiatsiya = Wages in Russia: evolution and differentiation. Moscow: Ed. HSE House; 2007. (In Russ.)

6. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth, NBER Working Papers 5151, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1995.

7. Becker G.S. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1964.

8. Benhabib J., Spiegel M. The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1994; 34(2).

9. Benhabib J., Spiegel M. Human Capital and Technology Diffusion, [in:] Handbook of Economic Growth. 2005; 1; Part A.

10. Cohen D., Soto M. Growth and Human Capital: Good Data, Good Results. CEPR Discussion Papers 3025. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers; 2001: 3–5.

11. Faggian A., Modrego F., McCann P. Human capital and regional development. Handbook of regional growth and development theories. 2019: 149-171. DOI: 10.4337/9781788970020.00015.

12. Fuente A. de la, Ciccone A. Human capital in a global and knowledge-based economy. Final report, Employment and Social affairs, European Commission; 2002.

13. Galor O., Moav O. From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development. Review of Economic Studies. Oxford University Press; 2004: 71(4).

14. Galor O., Tsiddon D. Technological Progress, Mobility, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review. 1997; 87(3): 363–82.

15. Hashimoto M. Training and employment relations in Japanese firms. Market failure in training? Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1991: 153-183.

16. Krueger A., Lindahl M. Education and Growth: Why and for Whom? Journal of Economic Literature. 2001: 39.

17. Lucas R.E. On the mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988; 22: 7–10.

18. Martin P., Ottaviano G. Growth and Agglomeratin. International Economic Review. 1991; 42: 947-968.

19. Northcott J., Walling A. The Impact of Microeconomics, Diffusion Benefits and Problems in Britich Industry. London: Policy Studies Institute; 1988.

20. Northcott J., Vickrey G. Surveys of the Diffusion of Microeconomics and Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Paper presented at MIT/NSF/ OECD Workshop on The Productivity Impact of Information Technology Investments; 1993.

21. Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long run growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1986: 4(5).

22. Schultz T.W. Investment in Human Capital // The American Economic Review. 1961; 51/1: 1–17.

23. Lundberg S. Noncognitive skills as human capital. Education, Skills, and Technical Change: Implications for Future US GDP Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2017: 219-243.

24. Mellander C., Florida R. The rise of skills: Human capital, the creative class, and regional development. Handbook of regional science. 2021: 707-719.


Review

For citations:


Aletdinova A.A., Koritskiy A.V., Shadrintseva A.N. Comparative Assessment of the Human Capital Impact on the Population Income in the European and Asian Regions of Russia. Statistics and Economics. 2023;20(2):42-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/2500-3925-2023-2-41-50

Views: 431


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)