Research of organizational structure of retail business and educational institution by methods of statistical analysis
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2019-1-11-21
Abstract
The purpose of the study. The purpose of the research is to define a previously developed theoretical evolution model of an organizational structure, that is based on the hypothesis that the two types of organizational structures, consecutive and parallel, succeed each other, undergoing quality changes with the growth and development of organisations, though pertaining properties which determine the structure characteristics and provide a sufficient growth of organizations’ efficiency. Following the results of the authors’ previous research, it was hypothesized that the growth of an organization during a transition from one to the other type of organization structure follows either intensive or extensive pattern and is defined by the type of the transformation.
Materials and methods. The study analyzed the retail trade sector, with isolated branches that distinguish this type of organizational structures, and educational institutions. The authors believe that organizations of similar types possess similar (consecutive and parallel) organizational structures. Groups of similar objects were identified by the cluster analysis used for grouping basic data. Following this, the results of cluster analysis were defined and key factors for patterns of organizational development were selected by the principal component analysis. Also, the Objectives Tree method was applied to gauge the effect of the types of educational services on the performance of private educational organizations and their structure. The research analyzed the data obtained from the database of commercial organizations of Czech Republic.
Results. In general, the proposed model of the evolution of an organizational structure in retail business was redefined, and the outcomes of the conducted analysis allow defining the following:
– when transitioning from the parallel to the consecutive organizational structure, the growth can be described as intensive, and while the consecutive model transitions to the parallel organizational structure the growth follows the extensive pattern;
– development of retail business is defined by the three key factors: size of an organization, its performance efficiency and lifetime. The cluster analysis of educational organisations revealed seven clusters. After analysis of average values of variables, these clusters can be grouped in five. These outcomes led to the additional research with Objectives Tree, which showed that both small and large educational organisations employ their certain typical features of educational services. A similar pattern describes certain types of educational services in the organisations of different lifetime.
Conclusion. The outcomes of the cluster analysis of commercial organisations of two sectors of Czech Republic and their further analysis confirmed the suggested hypothesis and matched corresponding theoretical evolution models of organizational structures, the results also showed intensive growth when transitioning from the parallel to the consecutive organizational structure and extensive growth when the transition changes from the consecutive to the parallel organizational structure. The alternating patterns of consecutive and parallel structures, as well as suggested gauging of the transition effectiveness will allow owners and management staff to efficiently maintain sustainable development of commercial organisations.
About the Authors
Aleksandr L. BobkovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Industrial Economics
Igor V. Denisov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Professor, Professor of the Department of Management
Oksana V. Kuchmaeva
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economics), Professor, Professor of the Population Department
References
1. Burns T., Stalker G. M. Mechanistic and organic systems of management. Sociology of Organizations: Structures and Relationships. 2011; 14.
2. Ghiselli E. E., Siegel, J. P. Leadership and managerial success in tall and flat organization structures. Personnel Psychology. 1972; 25(4). P. 617–624.
3. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organizations. In: Readings in Strategic Management Palgrave, London; 1989. P. 322–352.
4. Aoki M. Horizontal vs. vertical information structure of the firm. The American Economic Review. 1986. P. 971–983.
5. Keeling R. P., Underhile R., Wall A. F. Horizontal and vertical structures: The dynamics of or ganization in higher education. Liberal Education. 2007; 93(4). P. 22–31.
6. YUsim V.N., Svirchevskiy V.D., Bobkov A.L. Productivity of the parallel-serial manufacturing lines. Nauchnyye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika firmy = Scientific research and development. The economy of the company. 2015; 4(4): 43–54. (In Russ.)
7. Freiheit, T., Shpitalni, M., Hu, S. J. Productivity of paced parallel-serial manufacturing lines with and without crossover. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2004; 126(2). P. 361–367.
8. Denisov I.V. Teoriya ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya firm = Theory of economic and technological development of firms. Moscow: Grif i K = Grif and Co; 2008. (In Russ.)
9. Bobkov A.L., Denisov I.V., Kuchmayeva O.V. The development of the organizational structure of retail enterprises (on the example of the Czech Republic). Statistika i Ekonomika = Statistics and Economics. 2017; 14; 3: 31–40. (In Russ.)
10. Bobkov A.L., Denisov I.V., Kuchmayeva O.V. Cluster analysis of financial, economic and organizational and structural indicators of educational organizations of the Czech Republic. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika = International Trade and Trade Policy. 2017; 4 (12): 133–148. (In Russ.)
11. Foster R. N. Working the S-curve: assessing technological threats. Research Management. 1986; 29(4). P. 17–20.
12. Christensen C. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press. 2013
13. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of operations management. 2003; 21(2). P. 129–149.
14. Emma Bell, Alan Braymen Metody sotsial’nykh issledovaniy. Gruppy, organizatsii i biznes = Methods of social research. Groups, organizations and business Moscow: Humanitarian Center; 2012. (In Russ.)
15. Zamkov O.O., Tolstopyatenko A.V., CHeremnykh YU.N. Matematicheskiye metody v ekonomike = Mathematical methods in economics. Moscow: Delo i Servis = Business and Service; 1999. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bobkov A.L., Denisov I.V., Kuchmaeva O.V. Research of organizational structure of retail business and educational institution by methods of statistical analysis. Statistics and Economics. 2019;16(1):11-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2019-1-11-21