The axiom about the market (cadastral) cost of the reproducible factors of a single propert

The purpose of the study. To prove the methodological error of the calculation of the market (cadastral) value of capital construction objects, as a result of a violation of the Federal law of the Russian Federation of 29.07.1998 No. 135-FZ “On valuation activities in the Russian Federation”, article 3, in determining the market value of the property. To show that the theory and practice of measuring the value of real estate is necessary to delimit the elements of the market value formation of reproducible and not reproducible factors single property. Materials and methods. The objectives of the article are: the rules of law in assessment activities; the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate in settlements of Russia; comparative analysis of the factors determining the market (cadastral) value of real estate. Results. Formulated the axiom about the market (cadastral) cost of the reproducible factors of a single property. It is shown that in the theory and practice of measurement in market (cadastral) value of real estate of Russia violated article 3 of the law 135-FZ of 29.07.1998. As a consequence, the market (cadastral) cost of the capital construction objects 2-5 times overestimated, and the market (cadastral) value of land in the 2-15 times underestimated. This is the basis of corruption, challenging the results of cadastral assessment of problems of formation of budgets of all levels, reduction in the rate of economic development of Russia. According to our results of the cadastral assessment of land plots of various categories of land in the regions of Russia there is a technology of determining the economic norms of rational use of real estate. Conclusion. Regardless of technology assessment of the property market value of reproducible improvements of the land may not exceed their replacement cost.

1. Federal’nyy zakon RF ot 29.07.1998 g. No. 135-FZ “Ob otsenochnoy deyatel’nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii”. (In Russ.)

2. Federal’nyy standart otsenki “Obshchie pony-atiya otsenki, podkhody i trebovaniya k provedeniyu otsenki» (FSO No. 1)”, prikaz MER Rossii No.297 ot 20.05.2015g. (In Russ.)

3. Federal’nyy standart otsenki “Tsel’ otsenki i vidy stoimosti» (FSO No. 2)”, prikaz MER Rossii No. 298 ot 20.05.2015 g. (In Russ.)

4. Federal’nyy standart otsenki No. 3 “Trebovani-ya k otchetu ob otsenke (FSO No.3)”, prikaz MER Rossii No. 299 ot 20.05.2015 g. (In Russ.)

5. Federal’nyy standart otsenki No. 4 “Opredelenie kadastrovoy stoimosti (FSO No. 4)”, prikaz MER Rossii No. 508 ot 22.10.2010 g. (In Russ.)

6. Federal’nyy standart otsenki No. 7 “Otsenka nedvizhimosti (FSO No.7)”, prikaz MER Rossii No.611 ot 25.09.2014g (In Russ.)

7. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po opredeleniyu rynochnoy stoimosti zemel’nykh uchastkov, utverzhdennye Rasporyazheniem Ministerstva imushchestvennykh otnosheniy Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 06.03.2002 g. No. 568-r. (In Russ.)

8. Metodicheskie ukazaniya o gosudarstvennoy kadastrovoy otsenke. Prikaz MER RF ot 12.05.2017 No. 226. (In Russ.)

9. Ob utverzhdenii klassifikatora vidov razreshennogo ispol’zovaniya zemel’nykh uchastkov, prikaz MER Rossii No. 540 ot 01.09.2014 g. (In Russ.)

10. Otsenka stoimosti nedvizhimosti. Gribovskiy S.V., Ivanova E.N., L’vov D.S., Medvedeva O.E. Moscow: INTERREKLAMA, 2003. 704 p. (In Russ.)

11. Il’in M.O. Otsenka ob»ektov kapital’nogo stroitel’stva dlya tseley osparivaniya. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. No. 6 (177). (In Russ.)

12. Leyfer L.A., Kraynikova T.V. Prakticheskoe primenenie modifitsirovannogo metoda vydeleni-ya dlya otsenki zemel’nykh uchastkov i ob»ektov kapital’nogo stroitel’stva.. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v RF. 2016. No. 3 (174). P. 31–48. (In Russ.)

13. Vlasov A.D., Pon’ko V.A. Izmerenie astrogeofizicheskogo prostranstva/Voprosy modelirovaniya geokosmicheskikh svyazey. Trudy nauchnogo tsentra “Ekoprognoz”. Iss. 1. RASKhN Sib. otdnie: Novosibirsk, 1996. P. 29-38. URL: http://www. cal.su/show_art.php?id=14. (In Russ.)

14. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po opredeleniyu rynochnoy stoimosti zemel’nykh uchastkov po kadastrovym kvartalam goroda Novosibirska. 4 ed. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN, 2007. 125 p. URL: http://www.cal.su/show_art.php?id=5. (In Russ.)

15. Vlasov A.D. Teoreticheskie osnovy i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie predposylki opredeleniya ekonomicheskikh normativov ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniya zemel’nykh resursov. URL: http:// www.cal.su/show_art.php?id=92. (In Russ.)

16. Vlasov A.D. Doklad. Praktika primeneniya teorii otsenki nedvizhimosti v Rossii. URL: http:// www.cal.su/show_art.php?id=103 (In Russ.)

17. Publichnaya kadastrovaya karta Rosreestra. URL: www.maps.rosreestr.ru. (In Russ.)

18. Fond dannykh gosudarstvennoy kadastrovoy otsenki. URL: https://rosreestr.ru/wps/portal/ cc_ib_svedFDGKO. (In Russ.)

19. Varlamov A. A. Sistema gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya: uchebnik. Moscow: GUZ. 2014. 452 p. (In Russ.)

20. Otsenka nedvizhimosti: uchebnik Ed. A. G. Gryaznovoy, M. A. Fedootovoy. 2 ed. Moscow: Finansy i statictika, 2008. 860. (In Russ.)

21. Korostelev S.P. Kadastrovaya otsenka. Itogi. URL: http://www.labrate.ru/articles/2016-1_korostelev.pdf. (In Russ.)

22. Vlasov A.D., Zharnikov V.B. O rynochnoy (kadastrovoy) stoimosti uluchsheniy zemel’nogo uchastka. Vestnik SGUGiT. 2017. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 147–160. (In Russ.)