Strategy of the effective structure of farmers funding

Research objective. Scientific research raises the problem of state support of peasant farms in Russia, consisting in disproportions in the structure of the budget subsidies of farmers, showing that a significant proportion of directions and types of budgetary allocations is provided by state support for lending to agricultural production.
On the one hand, this measure is directed to activization of agrarian policy on attraction of additional loan sources of financing. On the other hand, at insufficient interest of financial structures in agricultural industry, weak competitiveness of landowners with the banking sector, low availability of credit resources to the most part of producers, the specified support measures only promote growth of debt load of major agricultural firms and limit farmers in obtaining budgetary funds that does not increase their special legal status and the importance for agrarian economy, does not add social importance for rural territories, does not lead to increase in the general effectiveness in agricultural production and does not promote efficiency to use the means of support, and, therefore, demands formation basic other more effective approach to subsidizing of small farms in the village. Therefore, a research objective is justification and development of strategic models of structure optimization of the budgetary support of peasant farms, taking into account efficiency of measures, which relevance is confirmed by scientific research of the leading scientists in this subject area.
Materials and methods. The study used: data of state programs on agricultural industry during 2008-2012 and 2013–2020; analytical materials of national reports of their realization; statistical information resources of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation; consolidated, individual financial and economic reports on agricultural producers of Penza region, which are processed by the methods of logical analytics, structural diagnostics, methodological synthesis of scientific research, the quantitative analysis and other economic-mathematical tools with the use of application programs of SPSS statistical package and mathematical Mathcad package.
Results. As part of the research econometric models of influence of the budget transfers on results of agrarian activity and development of peasant farms in terms of forms and types of the state subsidies, where functional dependences of revenues and profits from subsidies, allocated to support farmers are defined by 90% and 70% respectively, at the same time the budget transfers have the positive impact on the specified financial results. Based on the received coefficients of regression the model of structure optimization of the state support of farmers, which proceeds from maximizing a share of revenue from agricultural industry in a gross regional product, is constructed.
Conclusion. In the new look the structure of the state support of peasant farms will allow to increase greatly effect of use of budgetary funds, to increase efficiency of agricultural production, to increase the economic importance of country farms, to keep the social status of rural territories.

1. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.07.2012 No 717 «O Gosudarstvennoi programme razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaistva i regulirovaniya rynkov sel’skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii, syr’ya i prodovol’stviya na 2013–2020 gody» (In Russ.)

2. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva RF No 864-r ot 10.05.2016 «Natsional’nyi doklad o khode i rezul’tatakh realizatsii v 2015 godu Gosudarstvennoi programmy razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaistva i regulirovaniya rynkov sel’skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii, syr’ya i prodovol’stviya na 2013–2020 gody» (In Russ.)

3. Akimova Yu.A., Kochetkova S.A. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoi podderzhki agrarnoi sfery regiona v sovremennykh usloviyakh. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2015. No. 8. 1. P. 168–172. (In Russ.)

4. Baryshnikov N.G. Analiz i osobennosti otsenki effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya subsidii v sel’skom khozyaistve. Audit i finansovyi analiz. 2008. No. 4. P. 163–167 (In Russ.)

5. Baryshnikov N.G. Vozmozhnosti razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaistva v usloviyakh VTO: regional’nyi aspect. Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaistva Rossii. 2014. No. 4. P. 27–33 (In Russ.)

6. Baryshnikov N.G. Ekonometricheskie modeli analiza i otsenki effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya byudzhetnykh resursov v sel’skom khozyaistve. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2012. No. 24. (279). P. 2–10. (In Russ.)

7. Borovikov V.P., Ivchenko G.I. Prognozirovanie v sisteme STATISTICA v srede Windows. Osnovy teorii i intensivnaya praktika na komp’yutere. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 2006. (In Russ.)

8. Borodin I. Sovershenstvovanie mer gosudarstvennoi podderzhki sel’skogo khozyaistva Rossii v usloviyakh ogranichennosti byudzhetnykh resursov. Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaistva Rossii. 2014. No. 10. P. 27–30. (In Russ.)

9. Gubanova E.V., Polishchuk A.P. Effektivnost’ agrarnykh investitsionnykh proektov i vozmozhnosti ee povysheniya. Agrarnyi vestnik Verkhnevolzh’ya. 2016. No. 1. P. 72–79. (In Russ.)

10. Eliseeva I.I., Bochenina M.V., Kapralova E.B. i dr. Statistika v 2 t. Tom 2. Uchebnik 4 Iss., Ser. 58 Bakalavr. Akademicheskii kurs. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Yurait, 2016. 346 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kolyvanov V.Yu., Khalimalov M.M. Metodicheskie aspekty optimizatsii raspredeleniya gosudarstvennoi podderzhki khozyaistvuyushchim sub»ektam sel’skogo khozyaistva. Ekonomicheskaya nauka v 21 veke: voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. P. 32–35. (In Russ.)

12. Magomedov A.M., Buchaev Ya.G. Effektivnost’ finansovykh potokov v agropromyshlennom komplekse regiona. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2014. No. 4. (64). P. 60. (In Russ.)

13. Melekhina, P.Yu. Problemy finansirovaniya malogo biznesa v Rossii. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo. 2011. No. 11. Iss. 2. (196). P. 16–22. (In Russ.)

14. Bespakhotnyi G.V., Baryshnikov N.G., Tolmanov V.E. et al. Metodika planirovaniya byudzhetnykh subsidii dlya sel’skokhozyaistvennykh tovaroproizvoditelei. Ros. akad. s.-kh. nauk, Vseros. nauch.-issled. in-t ekonomiki, truda i upr. v sel. khoz-ve. Ural. gos. s.-kh. akad. Moscow, 2007. – 50 p. (In Russ.)

15. Mironova I.A. Analiz i otsenka vliyaniya gosudarstvennoi podderzhki na finansovoe sostoyanie predpriyatii APK (na primere Respublika Buryatiya): Dissertatsiya na soisk. uchen. step. kand. ek. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg-Pushkin, 2004. P. 279. (In Russ.)

16. Romanov R.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh vlozhenii v sel’skoe khozyaistvo (na primere Respubliki Marii El): Avtoref. dis. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. ekon. nauk. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2005. P. 20. (In Russ.)

17. Samygin D.Yu., Baryshnikov N.G. Modeli prognozirovaniya strategicheskogo razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaistva. Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve. 2015. No. 1 (13). P. 81–86. (In Russ.)

18. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 1977. Vol. 6 (1) P. 21–37.

19. Anatolyev S. Durbin-Watson statistic and random individual effects. Econometric Theory. 2003. Vol. 19. No. 5. P. 882–883.

20. Anselin L. Under the hood – issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics. 2002. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 247–267.

21. Buongiorno J. Forest sector modeling: a synthesis of econometrics, mathematical programming, and system dynamics methods. International Journal of Forecasting. 1996. No. 12. P. 329–343.

22. Koenker R. and Xiao, Z. Unit root quantile autoregression inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 2004. No. 99. P. 775–787.

23. Kuzmina E.V., Kuzmina E.S. Optimization of funding mechanisms for the entities of agrarian and industrial complex in modern conditions. Achievements of modern science. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 12. P. 159–162.

24. Marquez J. The Econometrics of elasticities or the elasticity of econometrics: An empirical analysis of the behavior of U. S. imports. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1994. Vol. 76. P. 471–481.

25. Perron P. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Further evidence from a new approach. J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 1988. No. 12. P. 297–332.

26. Phillips P.C.B. Econometric analysis of Fisher’s equation. Amer. J. Econom. Sociol. 2005. No. 64. P. 125–168.

27. Theil H., Clements K. Applied demand analysis: Results from system-wide approaches. Ballinger. Cambridge, 1987.

28. Tropina V.B. Optimization of the innovative activity budget support system in Ukraine. Naukovii vіsnik polіssya. 2016. Vol. 1. No. 1(5). P. 64–68.

29. Weeks Melvyn. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Journal of applied econometrics. 2002. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 191.

30. Wymer C.R. Structural nonlinear continuous-time models in econometrics. Macroeconomic Dynamics. 1997. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 518–548.

31. Zhang Z., Ma H. Order-preserving strong schemes for sdes with locally lipschitz coefficients. Applied Numerical Mathematics. 2017. Vol. 112. P. 1–16.

32.