AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE CHOICE OF METHODS OF EVALUATION OF IT PROJECTS
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2015-5-159-163
Abstract
An integrated approach to the choice of methods of evaluation of it projectsThe integrated approach of a choice of methods for estimation of IT projects taking into account a set of methods, parameters and criterion of their choice depending on specific conditions of implementation of projects is presented in the article.
About the Authors
Ivan A. Gladkov
Belgorod University of cooperation, Economics and law
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktoria S. Nehotina
Belgorod University of cooperation, Economics and law
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5. - 1992, pp. 297-323.
2. B. Roy. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. // Theory and Decision. - 31 (1). - 1991, pp. 49-73.
3. C.A. Bana e Costa and J.C. Vansnick. The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Methods and Applications of Multicriteria Decision Making. - FUCAM, Faculty Universitaires Catholiques de Mons, 1997, pp. 86-88.
4. D. Bouyssou and P. Perny. Ranking methods for valued preference relations - A characterization of a method based on leaving and entering flows. European Journal of Operational Research, 61(1-2). - 1992, pp. 186-194.
5. E. Hinloopen and P. Nijkamp. Regime-methods voor ordinal multicriteria-analyses. Kwantitatieve Methoden. - 7(22). - 1986, pp. 61-78.
6. H. Pastijn and J. Leysen. Constructing an outranking relation with ORESTE. // Mathematical and Computer Modelling. - №12 (10/11). - 1989, pp. 1255-1268.
7. H. Voogd. Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. PionLtd., London. - 1983. - 376 p.
8. J.C. Vansnick. On the problem of weighs in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach). // European Journal of Operational Research. - №24. - 1986, pp. 288-294.
9. J.H.P. Paelinck. Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. // Papers of the Regional Science Association. - №36. - 1976, pp. 59-74.
10. L.R. Gardiner and R.E. Steuer. Unified interactive multiple-objective programming - An open-architecture for accommodating new procedures. // Journal of the Operational Research Society. - №45. - 1994, pp. 1456-1466.
11. M. Grabisch, T. Murofushi, M. Sugeno (eds.). Fuzzy Measures and Integrals. Theory and Applications. // Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. - vol. 40. - Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. - 2000, pp. 3-41.
12. M.Roubens. Ordinal multiattributes sorting and ordering in the presence of interacting points of view. In D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagreze, P. Perny, R. Slowinski, Vanderpooten D. and P. Vincke, editors. Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria: Essays in Honour of Bernard Roy. - Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. - 2001, pp. 229-246.
13. R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa. Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs. - Cambridge University Press, New York. - 1993. - 569 p.
14. W.S.M. De Keyser and P.H.M. Peeters. ARGUS - A new multiple criteria method based on the general idea of outranking. - In M. Paruccini, editor, Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. - 1994, pp. 263-278.
15. Y. Siskos and D. Yannacopoulos. UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. // Investigacao Operacional. - №5(1). - 1985, pp. 39-53.
16. Saati T.L. Decision-making -the Method of the Analysis of Hierarchies. - M.: Radio and Communication, 1993. - 278th page
Review
For citations:
Gladkov I.A., Nehotina V.S. AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE CHOICE OF METHODS OF EVALUATION OF IT PROJECTS. Statistics and Economics. 2015;(5):159-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2015-5-159-163
Views:
603
.png)
.png)
Email this article 