INFORMATION PROVIDING ISSUESIN MICROFINANCE EFFECTIVENESS ASSESMENT
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2015-4-95-99
Abstract
Microfinance as compared to the banking activity, more closely linked to the real economy by taking feedback information channels for actual result of financial investments. Control over a traditional bank loan, mainly aimed at ensuring the timely and full refunding, is issued by loans and loan interests, with the simultaneous implementation of strict control of maintaining the stability of the banking system. In addition, the micro finance organizations (MFI) not only interested in the collection and evaluation of the results, coming form the financial sector, but also making monitoring of micro crediting in the real economy, because in addition to economic, microfinance activity also haunts social mission. In article is presented ways for information consolidation of micro financing social economic outcomes, bases on aggregate indices calculation.
About the Authors
Artak T. Yarazyan
Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics (MESI)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Armen G. Tshughuryan
Yerevan Northern University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bykovec M.V Public administration. Elektronnyj vestneyk Vypusk № 45. August 2014 g.
2. The evaluation of microfinance, // Economy and Business, October, 2011, pp.12-14.
3. The federal law of the Russian Federation On microfinancial activity and the microfinancial organizations of July 2, 2010 № 151-FZ, article 4.
4. Development of microfinancing in Uzbekistan// Centr ekonomicheskih Issledovanij Tashkent, 2005, str. 11.
5. Jennifer Lindsay, An Evaluation on the Effectiveness of Micro Finance Institutions, SPEAHonors Thesis, 2010 pp. 24-26.
6. Milford Bateman Microfinance as a development and poverty reduction policy: is it everything it’s cracked up to be?, Overseas Development Institute, March 2011, p. 3.
7. Microfinance barometry 2013, Survey Results: Establishing a Baseline for the World on Social Performance Management Implementation, part IV.
8. Gonzalez, A. Is Microfinance Growing Too Fast? Washington, DC: Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX), 2010, p. 9.
9. Быковец М.В. Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. Выпуск № 45. Август 2014 г.
10. The evaluation of microfinance, //Economy and Business, October, 2011, pp.12-14.
11. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации О микрофинансовой деятельности и микрофинансовых организациях от 2 июля 2010 года. № 151-ФЗ, статья 4.
12. Развитие микрофинансирования в Узбекистане, Центр экономических Исследований Ташкент, 2005, стр. 11.
13. JenniferLindsay,AnEvaluation on the Effectiveness of Micro Finance Institutions, SPEAHonors Thesis, 2010 pp. 24-26.
14. Milford Bateman Microfinance as a development and poverty reduction policy: is it everything it’s cracked up to be?, Overseas Development Institute, March 2011, p. 3.
15. Microfinance barometry 2013, Survey Results: Establishing a Baseline for the World on Social Performance Management Implementation, part IV.
16. Gonzalez, A. Is Microfinance Growing Too Fast? Washington, DC: Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX), 2010, p. 9.
Review
For citations:
Yarazyan A.T., Tshughuryan A.G. INFORMATION PROVIDING ISSUESIN MICROFINANCE EFFECTIVENESS ASSESMENT. Statistics and Economics. 2015;(4):95-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2015-4-95-99
Views:
760
.png)
.png)
Email this article 