STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAY
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2014-6 (2)-408-414
Abstract
This article reviews the progress achieved inimproving the pay system in public administration and outlines the key issues to be resolved.The cross-country comparisons presented inthe article suggest high differentiation in pay levels depending on position held. In fact,this differentiation in Russia exceeds one in OECD almost twofold The analysis of theinternal pay structure demonstrates that thelow share of the base pay leads to perversenature of ‘stimulation elements’ of the paysystem which in fact appear to be used mostlyfor compensation purposes. The analysis of regional statistical data demonstrates thatdespite high differentiation among regionsin terms of their revenue potential, averagepublic official pay is strongly correlated withthe average regional pay.
About the Author
Elena I. Dobrolyubova
Center of Public Administration Technologies, RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Мэннинг Н., Парисон Н. Реформа государственного управления: международный опыт. Пер с англ. М.: Весьмир, 2003. 496 c
2. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 19 ноября 2002 г. N 1336 "О федеральной программе "Реформирование государственной службы Российской Федерации (2003-2005 годы)"" http://www. rg.ru/2002/11/23/gosslujba-dok.html
3. Финансово-бюджетные последствия структурных реформ в РоссийскойФедерации. Всемирный банк. М.: ООО «ТОРГСТАТ», 2005
4. OECD. Government at a Glance, 2013 http://www.oecd.org/ gov/govataglance.htm
5. Клименко А.В., Клищ Н.Н. Можно ли сэкономить на бюрократии // Вопросы государственного управления. - 2013. - № 3
6. Александров О.В., Добролюбова Е.И., Клочкова Е.Н., Южаков В.Н. Оптимизация бюджетных расходов в сфере государственного управления. Московский государственный университет экономики, статистики и информатики (МЭСИ). Москва, 2014
7. Борщевский Г.А. Реформирование государственной службы в России: промежуточные итоги и перспективы// Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, 2014. № 2. С. 65-88, по результатам социологических исследований 2011 и 2013 гг
8. Manning N., Parison N. Reform of public administration: international experience. Per with English M.: Whole world, 2003. 496 with
9. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of November 19, 2002 № 1336 "About the federal program "Reforming of Public Service of the Russian Federation (2003-2005)"" http://www. rg.ru/2002/11/23/gosslujba-dok. html
10. The financial and budgetary consequences of structural reforms in the Russian Federation. World bank. M.: JSC TORGSTAT, 2005
11. OECD. Government at a Glance, 2013. http://www.oecd.org/gov/govataglance.htm
12. Klimenko A.V., Klish N.N. Is it possible to save on bureaucracy// Questions of public administration. - 2013. - No. 3
13. Alexandrov O.V., Dobrolyubova E.I., Klochkova E.N., Yuzhakov V. N. Optimization of the budgetary expenses in the sphere of public administration. Moscow State University of economy, statistics and informatics (MESI). Moscow, 2014
14. Borschevsky G.A. Reforming of public service in Russia: intermediate results and prospects//Questions of the public and municipal administration, 2014. No. 2. Page 65-88, by results of sociological researches 2011 and 2013
Review
For citations:
Dobrolyubova E.I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PAY. Statistics and Economics. 2014;(6 (2)):408-414. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2014-6 (2)-408-414
Views:
703
.png)
.png)
Email this article 