METHOD OF LIFECYCLE MODELS OF A CORPORATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SELECTION BASED ON QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF REQUIREMENTS TO SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2014-5-189-194
Abstract
Approach to Corporate information system development in terms of its lifecycle is investigated in thearticle. The article is focused on the lack of a quantitative method of the lifecycle models of Corporateinformation systems selection and emerging resulting complexities. It is proposed to select a modelwith quantitative-based assessment of the mainsystem’s characteristics identified in the analysis ofthe properties of the basic lifecycle models, as wellas peculiarities of their use in projects on creationof Corporate information systems. Worked out in thearticle selection model, takes into account bonds between the requirements to lifecycle models throughquantitative and expert evaluation under conditionsof lack of information.
Keywords
создание корпоративной информационной системы,
выбор модели жиз ненного цикла,
требования к характеристикам системы,
метод парного сравнения,
оценка свя зей между требованиями,
оценка адекватности выбора модели жизненного цикла ,
corporate information system development,
lifecycle model selection,
requirements to systems characteristics,
method of paired comparisons,
bonds between the requirements estimation,
estimation of the lifecycle model conformity selection
References
1. Chen D.Q. Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implication / D.Q. Chen
2. Milgrom, P. The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization / P. Milgrom, J. Roberts // American Economic Review. -1990. - 80(3). - P. 511 - 528
3. Избачков С.Ю., Петров В.Н. Информационные системы-СПб.: Питер, 2008. - 655 с
4. Вендров А.М. Проектирование программного обеспечения экономических информационных систем. - М.: Финансыистатистика, 2000. - 352с
5. ГОСТ Р ИСО/МЭК 12207-99. Информационная технология. Процессы жизненного цикла программных средств
6. Шафер Дональд Ф., Фатрелл Роберт Т., Шафер Линда И. Управление программными проектами: достижение оптимального качества приминимумезатрат.: Пер. сангл. - М.: Издательский дом «Вильямс», 2003. - 1136 с
7. Саати Т. Принятие решений. Методанализаиерархий. - М.: Радио и связь, 1993. - 278 с
8. Малугин В. А. Математика дляэкономистов: Линейнаяалгебра. Курс лекций. - М.: Эксмо, 2006. - 224 с
9. Chen D.Q. Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implication / D.Q. Chen, M. Mocker, D.S. Preston, A. Teubner // MIS Quar-terly. - 2010, 34(2). - P. 233-259
10. Milgrom P. The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization / P. Milgrom, J. Roberts // American Economic Review. -1990. - 80(3). - P. 511 - 528
11. Izbachkov S.Y., Petrov V.N. Information systems-St. Pb: St. Petersburg, 2008. - 655 p
12. Vendrov A. M. The economic’s information systems software development. - M.: Finance and statistics, 2000. - 352 p
13. GOST R ISO/IEC 12207-99. Information technology. The processes of the life cycle of software
14. Shaffer Donald F., Phatrell Robert T., Shaffer Linda I. Software projects management: achieving optimal quality at minimum expenditures. - M.: Publishing house “Williams”, 2003. - 1136 p
15. Saaty Thomas L. Decisions making. The Analytical hierarchy process. - М.: Radio and communication, 1993. - 278 p
16. Malugin V.A. Mathematics for economists: linear algebra. The course of lectures. - М.: Exmo, 2006. - 224 p
Review
For citations:
Petrenko M.I. METHOD OF LIFECYCLE MODELS OF A CORPORATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SELECTION BASED ON QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF REQUIREMENTS TO SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES. Statistics and Economics. 2014;(5):189-194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2014-5-189-194
Views:
520
.png)
.png)
Email this article 