Russian Creative Economy in Macroeconomic Statistics: Classification Issues and Added Value Dynamics
https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2026-2-36-44
Abstract
The purpose of this research consists in the identification and systematization of approaches that explain the variability of the structure of the creative economy as a set of economic activities.
Materials and methods. The study of the variability in the structure of the creative economy is based on reports from the Department of Culture, Media and Sport of the United Kingdom (1998) and international organizations (1986, 2008, 2009, 2025), as well as on the methodology of Rosstat. The main method of structure analysis of the creative economy is intended to summarize the positions of both government and international organizations, as well as researchers in this field. The empirical basis of the study is the time series of added value of the creative economy, the share of added value in gross domestic product, indexes of the physical volume of added value of the creative economy in 2017–2025, as well as the added value of economic activities by class.
Results. The presence of groups of economic activities, representing the “core” of the creative economy has been revealed: groups related to natural and cultural heritage, music and performing arts, production of creative goods, publishing, television and radio, creative services (design, advertising and architecture). Groups of activities have been identified that are considered only in one of the classifications and represent a possible direction for the development of the creative economy: goods partially classified as creative, trade, wholesale and retail, creative benefits, rental and leasing in this area. Empirical assessment of the dynamics of the added value of the creative economy presents a significant difference in growth rates and volume indexes both in individual periods and for the entire period under review between the types of economic activities related to the informatization of individual processes and the other groups that make up the creative economy.
Conclusion. The change of the standard classifications, used to aggregate statistical data makes possible to more accurately assess the contribution of the creative economy in macroeconomic indexes. However, the creative industries included in the creative economy have different importance in its structure and show significantly different growth rates. The analysis of the existing classifications of creative industries provides an understanding of such differences and possible trajectories of transformation of the structure of the creative economy.
About the Author
M. A. KozlovaRussian Federation
Maria A. Kozlova, Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Economics
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Vollrat D. Zrelyy rost: pochemu ekonomicheskaya stagnatsiya yavlyayetsya priznakom uspekha = Mature Growth: Why Economic Stagnation Is a Sign of Success – Tr. from Eng. M. Markov and A. Lashcheva. Moscow: Gaidar Institute; 2023. 376 p. (In Russ.)
2. Creative economy outlook 2024. UNCTAD. [Internet]. 2024: 5. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctsce2024d2_en.pdf.
3. Concept for the Development of Creative Industries and Mechanisms for the Implementation of State Support for Them in Large and Major Urban Agglomerations until 2030. Approved by Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 20, 2021 No. 2613-r. [Internet]. Available from: http://static.government.ru/media/files/HEXNAom6EJunVIxBCjIAtAya8FAVDUfP.pdf. (In Russ.)
4. Baumol W. J., Bowen W.G. Performing arts – the economic dilemma: A study of problems common to theatre, opera, music and dance. New York: M.I.T. Press; 1966. 582 p.
5. Rubinshteyn A.YA. Opekayemyye blaga v sfere kul’tury: priznaki i posledstviya «bolezni tsen» = Patronized goods in the sphere of culture: signs and consequences of «price disease». Moscow: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences; 2012. 78 p. (In Russ.)
6. Muzychuk V.YU. Dolzhno li gosudarstvo finansirovat’ kul’turu?= Should the state finance culture? Moscow: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences; 2012. 60 p. (In Russ.)
7. Gumanitarnyy sektor paternalistskogo gosudarstva = Humanitarian sector of the paternalistic state - Ed. A. Ya. Rubinstein. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya; 2023. 300 p. (In Russ.)
8. Bogel’sdeyk SH., Maseland R. Kul’tura v ekonomicheskoy nauke: istoriya, metodologicheskiye rassuzhdeniya i oblasti prakticheskogo primeneniya v sovremennosti =Culture in Economic Science: History, Methodological Considerations, and Areas of Practical Application in the Modern World - Tr. from Eng. N.V. Avtonomova; Ed. V.S. Avtonomov. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publishing House; International Relations Publishing House; Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, St. Petersburg State University; 2016. 464 p. (In Russ.)
9. Flew T. The creative industries: culture and policy. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2012. 232 p.
10. Khorkkhaymer M., Adorno T. Dialektika prosveshcheniya. Filosofskiye fragmenty = Dialectics of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments – Tr. from German by M. Kuznetsova. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Medium, Yuventa; 1997. 311 p. (In Russ.)
11. Creative economy report 2008: The challenge of assessing the creative economy towards informed policy-making [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://unctad.org/publication/creative-economyreport-2008-challenge-assessing-creative-economytowards-informed.
12. Galloway S., Dunlop S. A critique of definitions of the cultural and creative industries in public policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2007; 13(1): 17-31.
13. Sistema statistiki kul’tury YUNESKO – 2009 (SSK) = UNESCO Cultural Statistics System – 2009 (CSS) [Internet]. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2010. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191061_rus.
14. 2025UNESCO Framework for cultural statistics. Part II. A classification guide [Internet]. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2025. 80 p. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000395491.
15. Official Statistical Methodology for Calculating the Indicators «Gross Added Value of the Creative Economy», «Share of Gross Added Value of the Creative Economy in the Gross Domestic Product of the Russian Federation», and «Index of Physical Volume of Gross Added Value of the Creative Economy». Approved by Order of Rosstat No. 138 of March 21, 2025. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/met138-21032025_CE.pdf. (In Russ.)
16. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po formirovaniyu sobiratel’nykh klassifikatsionnykh gruppirovok i sistemy pokazateley kreativnoy ekonomiki = Methodological recommendations for the formation of collective classification groupings and a system of indicators of the creative economy – Ed. L.M. Gokhberg, E.S. Kutsenko. Moscow: ISSEK HSE; 2025. 136 p. (In Russ.)
17. Official statistical methodology for calculating the indicators «Gross added value of the tourism industry», «Share of gross added value of the tourism industry in the gross domestic product of the Russian Federation» and «Index of physical volume of gross added value of the tourism industry». Approved by Order of Rosstat No. 130 dated June 26, 2025. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/met310-26062025.pdf. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kozlova M.A. Russian Creative Economy in Macroeconomic Statistics: Classification Issues and Added Value Dynamics. Statistics and Economics. 2026;23(2):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2026-2-36-44
JATS XML

















.png)
.png)




