Quantitative Methods of Selecting a Tool for Project Management in the Financial Sector

The relevance of the study is due to the difficulties inherent in the selection of tools designed for effective project management in the financial sector, as well as the increasing competition in the financial services market. Within the framework of this article, the features of the choice of a project management tool in the financial sector based on the use of quantitative methods that make the decision-making process significantly more meaningful and effective are disclosed.
The aim of the study is to develop elements of a methodology for quantitative analysis of alternative tools, including recommendations on the choice of alternatives and criteria for their analysis, as well as the complex use of various methods to justify the final choice of an instrument.
The research materials and methods reflected in the methodology of quantitative analysis of alternative project management tools in the financial sphere, and implemented in the course of the research, are based on supplementing the results obtained through the use of the classical basic level method – the method of geometric averages by methods of advanced level decision theory – the method of eigenvalues and vectors, as well as the ideal point method. In order to comprehensively analyze the project implementation support systems on the market and their instrumental capabilities, a twostage methodology is proposed in the research process, including both qualitative and quantitative assessment of available alternatives. The formalized assessment of the functionality of the pre-selected tools made it possible to justify the choice of the most preferred alternative. Particular attention is paid to the issues of attracting additional information to reduce uncertainty in the considered choice situation. Results. The main result of the conducted research was the scheme of substantiation of the optimal choice of a tool includes the construction of a variety of alternatives – tools of domestic and foreign development, the construction of a variety of criteria and the attraction of additional information to form a hierarchy of criteria, as well as a consistent quantitative assessment of each selected alternative according to all the criteria under consideration. The constructed set of alternatives includes the tools of Jira Software, Asana, Bitrix24, Megaplan, GanttPro, YouGile and Planfix. The set of criteria is limited to the six most significant criteria: “Convenience of communication within the framework of the tool”; “Price of the tool”; “Level of complexity of the tool”; “Integration with external services”; “Functionality of the tool”; “Convenience and simplicity of the tool interface”. The presented system of criteria takes into account the main functional and instrumental characteristics necessary for systems to support the implementation of projects in the financial sector at the level of small and medium-sized businesses.
Conclusion. The content of the article can be useful for improving decision-making processes during technological renewal and digitalization of projects in the financial sphere of small and medium-sized businesses in the context of the implementation of import substitution programs, the development of optimal choice mechanisms under several criteria. The described structure of the applied problem of multi-criteria selection can be used to update the content of such professionally significant academic disciplines for higher economic school as “Decision Theory” and “Instrumental methods in Economics”.

1. Vlasov D.A. Methods of quantitative analysis when making decisions in various information conditions. Sistemnyye tekhnologii = System technologies. 2018; 4(29): 18-29. (In Russ.)

2. Vlasov D.A. Features of the complex use of the eigenvalue method and the scenario method in the practice of decision making. Sistemnyye tekhnologii = System Technologies. 2021; 4(41): 137-147. (In Russ.)

3. Gnedykh V.A. What is a corporate project management system and why does a company need it? Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii = Modern scientific research and innovations. 2015; 4-4(48): 57-61. (In Russ.)

4. Gribov A.F. Proyektnyy analiz = Design analysis. Moscow: KnoRus; 2020. 352 p. (In Russ.)

5. Yegorova Ye.S., Popova N.A. Application of multivariate analysis to assess the functionality of project management systems. Modelirovaniye, optimizatsiya i informatsionnyye tekhnologii = Modeling, optimization and information technologies. 2019; 7; 2(25): 351-364. (In Russ.)

6. Saati T. Prinyatiye resheniy. Metod analiza iyerarkhiy = Decision making. Hierarchy analysis method. Moscow: Radio and communication; 1993. 278 p. (In Russ.)

7. Tikhomirov N.P., Tikhomirova T.M. Teoriya riska = Risk Theory. Moscow: Unity-Dana; 2020. 308 p. (In Russ.)

8. Tikhonov A.I., Sazonov A.A. Features of the transformation of project management systems in the digital business environment. Vestnik Akademii znaniy = Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2020; 37(2): 331-336. (In Russ.)

9. Fomin G.P., Sukhorukova I.V., Maksimov D.A., Aloshina I.F. Formation of indicators, criteria, measures, and risk assessment scales. Myagkiye izmereniya i vychisleniya = Soft Measurements and Computing. 2022; 52; 3: 5-10. (In Russ.)

10. Chekmarev A.V. Upravleniye IT-proyektami i protsessami = Management of IT projects and processes. Moscow: URAIT; 2023. 228 p. (In Russ.)

11. Yusufova O.M., Nevredinov A.R. Intelligent systems based on fuzzy computing and neural networks in project management. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2019; 8(109): 828-833. (In Russ.)

12. Chistyakova K.A., Yudin V.V. Practical methods of managing the implementation of innovative projects based on the use of the Jira software. Nauka i iskusstvo upravleniya = Science and Art of Management. 2023; 1: 80-93. (In Russ.)

13. Memetova F.S. Formation of tasks at the design stage in the Jira project management system. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya = Science and business: ways of development. 2020; 8(110): 69-72. (In Russ.)

14. Kiyamutdinova D.D., Bayanova A.A., Trapeznikova K.I., Kuzyashev A.N. Gantt chart and its relevance. Nauchnyy elektronnyy zhurnal Meridian = Scientific electronic journal Meridian. 2020; 4(38): 96-98. (In Russ.)

15. Akhmadullin D.F. Project management systems: Analysis of existing software solutions. Stud-Net. 2020; 3; 9: 894-901. (In Russ.)

16. Varlamov S.V., Skorodumov P.V. Organizational project management system: analysis of approaches and existing software solutions. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya = Issues of territorial development. 2015; 5(25): 5.

17. Stavtsev N.O. Comparative characteristics of CRM systems as a tool for interaction with clients. Colloquium-Journal. 2019; 11-1(35): 134-135. (In Russ.)

18. Burmistrov P.R. Research and practical development of the Bitrix 24 system for managing innovative projects. Yevraziyskoye Nauchnoye Ob”yedineniye = Eurasian Scientific Association. 2021; 2-4(72): 231-233.

19. Belyayev A.A., Bazhenov R.I. Online project management using Megaplan. Postulat = Postulate. 2019; 1-1(39): 38. (In Russ.)

20. Blinov A.O., Yakimets Yu.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the CRM-system “Megaplan”. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Science and Education. 2018; 17-1(53): 57-60. (In Russ.)

21. Strel’tsova M.N. Project management in the GanttPRO online system. Postulat = Postulate. 2020; 6(56): 10. (In Russ.)

22. Brumshteyn Yu.M., Dyudikov I.A. Comparative analysis of the functionality of project management software distributed according to the SAAS model. Prikaspiyskiy zhurnal: upravleniye i vysokiye tekhnologii = Caspian Journal: Management and High Technologies. 2014; 4(28): 34-51. (In Russ.)

23. Zhuravlev V.A. Application of the “ideal point” method and taking into account risks when choosing the best projects. Interaktivnaya nauka=Interactive Science. 2019; 1(35): 34-37. (In Russ.)

24. Safronov V.V. Application of the ideal point method in the space of criteria for solving the problem of hypervector ranking. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Nadezhnost’ i kachestvo» = Proceedings of the international symposium “Reliability and quality”. 2010; 1: 12-14. (In Russ.)

25. Lubentsova Ye.V., Ozhogova Ye.V., Lubentsov V.F. et al. A method of matching matrices of paired comparisons based on components of their maximum eigenvalues. Sovremennyye naukoyemkiye tekhnologii = Modern high technologies. 2020; 7: 78-83. (In Russ.)

26. Tikhomirova A.N., Sidorenko Ye.V. Modification of the method of analysis of hierarchies by T. Saaty for calculating the weights of criteria in the evaluation of innovative projects. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2012; 2: 261. (In Russ.)

27. Saati T.L. Prinyatiye resheniy pri zavisimostyakh i obratnykh svyazyakh: analiticheskiye seti = Decision making with dependencies and feedback: analytical networks. Tr. from Eng. O.N. Andreychikovoy ; nauch. red.: A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. Andreychikova. Ed. 2nd. Moscow: LIBROKOM; 2009. 357 p. (In Russ.)