Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Monitoring of The Consumption Level for Sustainable Development Goals

https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2022-1-18-27

Abstract

The indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals (hereinafter referred to as the SDGs) were developed by the UN members and are aimed at the sustainable development of countries in the field of social policy, ecology and ensuring the well-being of the population. Sustainable Development Goals in the field of social policy can be considered necessary for survival. Country indicators are calculated by statistical agencies in accordance with methodologies developed by the SDGs curator agencies. The Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) in accordance with the Federal Statistical Plan calculates most indicators for Russia. The standard of living of the population can be estimated indirectly as the share of the population’s expenditures on food, which are necessary for the physiological survival of a person. The literature notes that the existing criteria for the level of poverty can distort the real state. Therefore, the average per capita consumption level may depend on the size of the household. The paper considers the average per capita expenditure level on food in a household, depending on the characteristics of the household (number of members in the family, age groups). The paper also considers the differentiation of the regions of the Russian Federation in terms of the share of the population’s expenditures on food.
The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between the size of the household and its food expenditures, as well as the characteristics of the population’s expenditures, depending on the composition of the household, on food at home, outside the home and alcohol expenditures.
Materials and methods. The source of the data for statistical analysis is the Household Budget Surveys (HBS) conducted by Rosstat for 2010-2020 (11 years). Methods of statistical analysis are applied in the work; the author’s grouping of households is given depending on their characteristics. This survey is conducted quarterly for 48 thousand households. The performed calculations are presented for the year as an average value for 4 quarters. All necessary calculations were performed using the IBM SPSS application software package.
Results. The results obtained allow us to draw conclusions about the impact of household size on food consumption. The consumption schedule has a U-shape, where the lowest average per capita consumption is observed in households of three and four people. At the same time, in especially large households (6 or more people), a high share of food expenditures may indicate a high level of poverty. The indicator of the share and structure of household expenditures on food also depends on the characteristics of the household: the largest share of total food expenditures in final consumption expenditures in 2020 is observed in households from single pensioners (46.4%), and the smallest - in households from 2 adults and one child (31.8%). The largest share of spending on eating out is in households of adults and children. At the same time, the presence of a pensioner in the household reduces the share of household expenses for eating out. This dependence can be explained by the lack of time for cooking in the adult (working-age) population.
Conclusion. The paper presents the author’s system of grouping households according to their characteristics (number of members in the family, age affiliation, etc.). The results obtained make it possible to assess the differentiation in the structure of household expenditures on food, depending on the characteristics of the family.

About the Author

K. V. Kuznetsov
Federal State Statistics Service
Russian Federation

Kuznetsov Kirill Vladimirovich

Moscow



References

1. Abanokova K.R., Lokshin M.M. Effect of economies of scale in household consumption on poverty in Russia // Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, 18 (4), 620–644.

2. Berendeeva E.V. Transformation of the Russian food market: income and substitution effects // Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, vol. 23. no. 4, p. 605-623.

3. Berendeeva E.V., Ratnikova T.A. On the manifestations of the Deaton-Paxon paradox in the consumption of Russian households // Applied Econometrics, 2016, vol. 42, pp. 54–74.

4. Kuznetsov K.V. The study of population consumption in economic science // Bulletin of the Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov. Introduction. Path to science. 2021., vol. 11, no. 2(34) p. 33-42

5. Kuznetsov K.V. Features of the structure of agerelated expenses in the Russian Federation // Statistics and Economics, 2021, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 47-59

6. vcharova LN Proposals for a strategy to promote poverty reduction in modern Russia // Living standards of the population of regions of Russia. 2012. No. 10-11. pp. 78-89

7. Ovcharova LN Theoretical and methodological issues of definition and measurement of poverty // SPERO. Social policy: expertise, recommendations, reviews. 2012. No. 16. P. 15-38

8. Penikas G. I. Analysis of the evolution of consumer behavior in Russia for the period 2000-2005, // Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics Economic Journal, 2008, 12, issue 4, p. 512-542

9. Prokopiev M.G. Parametric methods for assessing economies of scale in household consumption // APK: Economics, Management. 2010, No. 12 p.74-80

10. Abdulai A. Economies of Scale and the Demand for Food in Switzerland: Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 54.2, P. 247-267

11. Abdulai A. Household Demand for Food in Switzerland. A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, 2002, 138. I. р. 1-18

12. Crossley T., Lu. Y. Exploring the returns to scale in food preparation. The Institute for Fiscal Studies. 2004, 28 p.

13. Deaton A., Muellbauer J. An Almost Ideal Demand System. The American Economic Review. 1980. Vol. 70. № 3. р. 312–326

14. Deaton A., Paxson C. Engel’s What? A response to Gan and Vernon.”Journal of Political Economy 2003, 111, no. 6, 1378-1381

15. Deaton A., Paxson C. Economies of scale, household size, and the demand for food. Journal of Political Economy, 1998, 106 (5), 897–930

16. Horowitz, A. Household size and the demand for food: a puzzle resolved? Paper presented at the Northeast Universities Development Consortium Conference, Williams College., 2002

17. Nelson J. Household economies of scale in consumption: theory and evidence. Econometrica. 1988., 56(6): 1301-1314

18. Vernon V. Food Expenditure, Food Preparation Time, and Household Economies of Scale. Fashion Institute of Technology, State University of New York, 2004


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov K.V. Monitoring of The Consumption Level for Sustainable Development Goals. Statistics and Economics. 2022;19(1):18-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2022-1-18-27

Views: 549


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)