Preparation of Innovative Development Rating of Russian Regions by the Level of University Involvement

The paper presents method of clustering and grouping the university performance indicators to prepare an integral rating of Russian regions by the level of university involvement in innovative development of Russian regions. The following problems that require the management influence of state structures are considered: the role of the research base of regional universities in strengthening the innovative potential of regions, the degree of involvement of universities in the innovative regional space.

The aim of the study is to develop a rating system for Russian regions according to the degree of university involvement in innovative development using mathematical tools and an intelligent data processing system. The main hypothesis of the article is the existence of a link between regional innovative development and the effectiveness of university contributions. The mathematical approach involves the consideration and multidimensional ranking of the main groups of university performance indicators in order to obtain cluster classifications within each of the problems posed. The solution to the problems is to build a barometer of innovation activity in the form of a multi-purpose problem-oriented rating.

Materials and methods. An approach is applied that includes the assessment and multidimensional ranking of the contribution of universities using groups of integral indices created on the basis of aggregation of several important indicators of the university’s activity. Computational experiments were conducted according to the data of the Ministry of Education and Science for the regions of Russia and regional universities. 16 indicators of Russian regions for 2016 are considered.

Results and discussion. The ranking and comparison of universities according to the degree of involvement in the innovative development of the region was performed using an indicator model and aggregation depending on the target problem. Quantitative indicators of the quality of university’s activities by regions are obtained, which allow us to obtain an integral rating of Russian regions by the level of university involvement. Unlike other approaches, the author’s method includes three components, which are independent integral indexes and indicate the level of involvement of universities in regional innovative development. Statistical data on the leading indicators of Russian universities for 2016 were processed. The methodology Science-model with three factors - the model with regrouping, named by the author A-B-C, showed the high potential of Russian universities to balance their regional demand as management research centers.

Conclusion. The results of the study are compared with the ratings of the well-known agencies. The author hopes that soon Russia will have a reliable scientometric system at the level of rating universities on their involvement in the innovative development of Russia, such a rating will be an indisputable argument in favor of financing regional universities. The author laid down a high requirement: compliance with the three models, only in this case, regional universities can receive funding from the municipality, after redistribution from the center. At the same time, it is necessary to carefully choose universities in which projects will receive development and perspective. Regional authorities must meet the requirements to receive the necessary investments in promising projects. The scientific potential and demand for theoretical research for their full application at all enterprises, the combination of theoretical science and practical implementation will reduce the cost of stabilizing outdated technologies in all areas of knowledge and use the experience of older generations and the strength of young people for high-tech production growth in Russia. Therefore, the results of the study will be useful to federal authorities and financial and credit organizations that provide financing.

1. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., et al. (2017). Prognozirovanie pokazatelej social'no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija regiona [The forecasting of regional social and economic development] // Economy of region, vol. 13, № 1, pp. 38-48 (in Russian).

2. Klyuev A.K. (2010). Programmy innovatsionnogo razvitiya regiona i universitetov: poisk sootvetstviya [Programs of innovative region and university development: search of equivalence] // University Management: Practice and Analysis. № 1, pp. 30-34 (in Russian).

3. Blind K. & Grupp H. (1999). Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences. Research Policy, 28 (2), pp. 451-468.

4. Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), pp. 92-116.

5. Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research // American Economic Review. 1989. № 79, pp. 957–970.

6. Seo. К.К. (2000). Managerial economics. Translation from English, Moscow: INFRA- M, 2000.

7. Goddard J. B., Chatterton Р. The response of universities to regional needs // European Journal of Education. 2000. № 35(4), pp. 475-496.

8. Teece D.J., Peteraf M., Leih S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58 (4), pp. 13-35.

9. Fratesi U. & Senn L. (2009). Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions: The Role of Internal and External Connections. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 368.

10. Benneworth, P. (2013). University Engagement With Socially Excluded Communities. Publisher: Springer Netherlands, Copyright Holder: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht,. – 352 p. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0.

11. Etzkowitz H. & Leydesdorff L. (1995). The triple helix–university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14 (1), pp. 14–19.

12. Vygodchikova I.Yu. et al. (2017). Estimation of Bond Risks using Minimax. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 7, p. 1899-1907, mar. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/784>. Date accessed: 15 mar. – doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v7.7(21).38.

13. Awrejcewicz J., et al. (2015). Quantifying chaos of curvilinear beam via exponents. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 27(1-3), 81-92.

14. Fritsch et al. (2007). Universities and Innovation in Space. Industry and Innovation, 14 (2), pp. 201-218.

15. Autant-Bernard C. (2001). Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case. Research Policy, 30 (7), pp. 1069-1078.

16. Derunova et al. (2014). The study of the dynamics of innovative development of economy on the endogenous growth through multi-sector extension of the Solow model. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia, 11(3), pp. 1581-1589.

17. Pisano G. P. (2010). The Evolution of Science-Based Business: Innovating, How we Innovate. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), pp. 465–482. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq013

18. Innovation Union Scoreboard. (2013). European Union Belgium, 80.

19. Podinovski V., Potapov M. (2013). Metod vzveshennoi summy kriteriev v analize mnogokriterial'nykh reshenii: pro et contra [Weighted sum method in the analysis of multicriterial decisions: pro et contra // Business informatics, no 3 (25), pp. 41-48 (in Russian).

20. van Vught F., Westerheijden Don F. (2010). Multidimensional ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy. Volume 22/3, OECD. Higher education management and policy, 22(3), pp. 6-11.

21. Kozlova O. A., Garkavenko A. N., Andreev E. L. (2008). Role of the university in the innovative development of regional economy. Economy of Region. №2 (14), pp. 64-74. (in Russian).

22. Varga, A., Sebestyén, T., Szabó, N., Szerb, L. (2020). Estimating the economic impacts of knowledge network and entrepreneurship development in smart specialization policy. Regional Studies 54, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1527026

23. Butko E.Ya. (2016). Indikatory kak instrument sravnitel'nogo analiza obrazovaniya [Indicators as a Tool for Comparative Analysis of Education] // Distance and virtual learning, № 1 (103), pp. 31-37. (in Russian).

24. Kurochkin D.A. (2014). Innovacionnaja sreda regiona i osobennosti ee formirovanija (na primere Moskovskoj oblasti) [Innovation environment of the region and features of its formation (for example, Moscow region)] // Вопросы региональной экономики. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 59-66. (in Russian).

25. Nizhegorodtsev R.M. Outlooks of knowledge generation in 21st century: functions and barriers// Economic Bulletin of ICS RAS. 2020, vol. 1. no 1, pp. 3-11 (in Russian).