Construction of an Economically Effective System of Target Indicators for the Development of University Research Activities Considering Correlation Dependencies

The development programs of Russian universities contain many different target indicators. Many of these indicators are focused on the development of the research activities. In the context of limited financial resources for development, the question of an effective system of target indicators is very important. To construct such a system of target indicators, three conditions must be met: 1) these target indicators do not contradict each other; 2) there are indicators with a positive effect on economic indicators; 3) subject areas are taken into account.

The aim of the research. This study is aimed to study linear correlation dependencies between the main indicators measuring the university’s publication activity and other scientometric, social and structural indicators.

Materials and methods. The study used economic, structural and scientometric data for 49 largest universities in Russia over 4 years, downloaded from monitoring the performance of educational institutions of higher education and the SciVal analytical tool.

Results. As part of the research, it was studied which variables are correlated with the taken scientometric variables. Due to the large number of variables involved in the primary analysis, the table contains only those variables that correlate with the variables under consideration with a correlation coefficient of more than 0.3 modulus.

Conclusion. The results obtained allow both to resolve the contradiction of the simultaneous increase in the number and quality of publications, and to highlight a number of links between scientometric indicators and indicators of university economics, internationalization and quality of admission. Knowledge of these dependencies is useful for compiling university development programs that do not contain internal contradictions. The conclusions obtained make it possible to increase the efficiency of construction a system of university target indicators in the research field in three areas: compiling the university development program with consistent target indicators, the inclusion of indicators with a positive impact on economic indicators, taking into account the peculiarities of the field of science and education in which the university operates.

1. Sandler D.G., Evsykova I.A., Bogantseva S.S., Melnik D.A., Sterkhov A.V., Bondarchuk, D.V. Usage of integrated indicators in the implementation of programs to improve competitiveness in the context of developing cooperation with the industry and improving the economic sustainability of universities. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2019: 341-355. (In Russ.)

2. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po razrabotke i aktualizatsii programmy razvitiya universiteta, v otnoshenii kotorogo Pravitel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federatsii ustanovlena kategoriya «federal'nyy universitet» ili «natsional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet» № AK-20/05-vn ot 13.03.2015 g. = Guidelines for the development and updating of the university development program, in respect of which the Government of the Russian Federation has established the category "federal university" or "national research university" No. AK-20/05-vn dated 13.03.2015. (In Russ.)

3. Pasport natsional'nogo proyekta «Nauka» (protokol ot 24.12.2018 g. № 16) = Passport of the national project "Science" (protocol dated 12.24.2018, No. 16) [Internet]. Available from: http://static.government.ru/media/files/vCAoi8zEXRVSuy2Yk7D8hvQbpbUSwO8y.pdf (cited 04.05.2020). (In Russ.)

4. Pasport natsional'nogo proyekta «Tsifrovaya ekonomika Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (protokol ot 24.12.2018 g. № 16) = Passport of the national project "Digital Economy of the Russian Federation" (protocol dated 12.24.2018, No. 16) [Internet]. Available from: http://static.government.ru/media/files/urKHm0gTPPnzJlaKw3M5cNLo6gczMkPF.pdf (cited 07.04.2020). (In Russ.)

5. Lawani S.M. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics. 1986; 9(1-2): 13-25.

6. Hayati Z., Ebrahimy S. Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics. 2009; 80(3): 625-636.

7. Michalska-Smith M.J., Allesina S. And, not or: quality, quantity in scientific publishing. PloS one. 2017; 12(6).

8. Clark B.R. Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 1998.

9. Geiger R.L. Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. New York: Stanford University Press; 2004.

10. Calderini M., Franzoni C. Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research. An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications. Bocconi University: Cespri Working Paper; 2004. 162.

11. Meyer M. Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventorauthors with their non-inventing peers in nanoscience and technology. Research Policy. 2006; 35(10): 1646-1662.

12. Van Looy B., Callaert J., Debackere K. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely coexisting? Research policy. 2006; 35(4): 596-608.

13. Van Looy B., Landoni P., Callaert J., Van Pottelsberghe B., Sapsalis E., Debackere, K. Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and tradeoffs. Research Policy. 2011; 40(4): 553-564.

14. Bozeman B., Fay D., Slade C. P. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2013; 38(1): 1-67.

15. Franklin S.J., Wright M., Lockett A. Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spinout companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2001; 26(1): 127-141.

16. Dietz, J. S. & Bozeman, B. Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy. 2005; 34(3): 349-367

17. Monitoring effektivnosti deyatel'nosti obrazovatel'nykh organizatsiy vysshego obrazovaniya = Monitoring the effectiveness of educational institutions of higher education [Internet]. Available from: http://indicators.miccedu.ru/monitoring/?m=vpo. (cited 20.03.2020). (In Russ.)

18. Salmi J. The challenge of establishing world class universities. The World Bank. 2009.