Statistics on Differences in the Institutional Composition of the National Economy and Issues Related to its Harmonization

This article focuses on the assessment of the size of the public sector, which goes back to the assessment of the degree of state participation in the domestic economy and remains controversial. Such assessments are often carried out without the presentation of threshold criteria and without evaluation of its effectiveness and combination with other institutional sectors. At the same time, it is obvious that the ratio between the public and other (non-state) sectors refers to the issue of strategic importance, to the issue of the effectiveness of the country's economic system in its integrity, and therefore requires theoretical, methodological and practical resolution.

The objectives of the research are: (1) to determine the relative scale and efficiency of the public sector functioning in the national economy, to establish minimum necessary and maximum possible values of its scale; (2) to determine the size and establish a measure of harmonious combination of institutional components of the domestic economy aimed at maximizing its efficiency.

Materials and methods. Theoretical foundations of the research have been developed on the basis of the authors' preferences regarding the results of conceptual and applied developments of domestic scientists in the field of philosophy, mathematics, economics and sociology, as well as the practice of structural and spectral analysis in their subject areas. The analysis of parameters (indicators) of the state and other institutional sectors of the national economy was carried out (mainly) on the basis of statistical data of ROSSTAT for 2006-2016, materials of official reports and developments of analytical centers. The methodological basis of the research is formed by works on modular theory of society, public sector economy, and structural harmony of systems. Tabular methods of visualization of research results and statistical methods of source data processing were used. Standard packages of Microsoft Office application programs were used for solving research tasks.

Results. It is shown that against the background of a decrease in relative resource capacity, the public sector over the period under review does not show an increase in the degree of government participation in the Russian economy. At the same time, performance indicators of the public sector did not show not only worse, but also worsening values, both as compared with the private sector and the economy as a whole. Criteria of minimum required and maximum possible scale of the public sector have been defined and it is shown that as of 2016 the integral indicator of the scale of the public sector of the Russian economy does not reach the minimum required value. A quantitative model for optimizing the sectoral composition of the national economy has been constructed. System solutions are proposed and a method for determining the share of institutional sectors in the structure of the national economy is given.

Conclusion. The article deals with the issues of state participation in the economy, defines the scale and efficiency of the public sector in the national economy. It is noted that within the limits of maximally liberal and maximally ethical ideological statements the task of optimization of neither the size of the public sector of the national economy nor the harmonious combination of its sectoral composition find a satisfactory solution. The analysis of institutional composition of the national economy has been carried out and the way of optimization of its structure has been shown, the direction of the state economic policy on optimization of institutional structure of the national economy has been determined. Orientation of economic policy towards achievement of optimal structure (harmony) of economic system (as well as the very movement towards it) will create conditions not only for increase of its efficiency, but also will allow to satisfy economic needs of socially-professional groups to the fullest extent, and society as a whole will successfully develop.

1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki po razvitiyu konkurentsii» № 618 ot 21.12.2017 = Decree of the President of the Russian Federation "On the main directions of state policy for the development of competition" No. 618 dated December 21, 2017. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, December 25, 2017, No. 52 (Part I), Art. 8111. (In Russ.)

2. Doklad o sostoyanii konkurentsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2016 god. FAS Rossii = Report on the state of competition in the Russian Federation for 2016. FAS Russia [Internet]. Available from: https://fas.gov.ru/documents/596439. (In Russ.)

3. Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo valyutnogo fonda po Rossii = Report of the International Monetary Fund for Russia [Internet]. 2018. № 18/275. Available from: http://imf.org›~/media/Files/Publications/CR/2018/. (In Russ.)

4. Abramov A.Ye., Aksonov I.V., Radygin A.D., Chernova M.I. Modern approaches to measuring the public sector: methodology and empirics. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic policy. 2018; 13; 1: 36–69; 2: 28-47. (In Russ.)

5. Chernopyatov A.M., Akhmetov L.A., Dzhurayev D.M. Public sector in the economy of the Russian Federation. Fundamental'nyye issledovaniya = Fundamental research. 2018; 4: 138-145. (In Russ.)

6. Simonova YU.V., Smirnova O.O. The value of state-owned companies in strategic planning of the development of the Russian economy. Problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta = Problems of Economics and Management. 2015; 7: 53-53. (In Russ.)

7. Gordeyeva Ye.S. The relationship between the concentration of capital in companies with state participation with the efficiency of their activities and ways to increase it. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik = Public Administration. Electronic bulletin. 2012: 34. (In Russ.)

8. Doklad Tsentra strategicheskikh razrabotok “Effektivnoye upravleniye gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost'yu v 2018–2024 gg. i do 2035 g.” (yanvar' 2018 g.) = Report of the Center for Strategic Research “Effective management of state property in 2018–2024. and until 2035 " (January 2018) [Internet]. Available from: https://strategy.csr.ru/user/pages/researches/Doklad_effektivnoe_upravlenie_gossobstvennostyu_Web.pdf. (In Russ.)

9. Sil'noye gosudarstvo – vybor Rossii. Ugrozy, tsennosti, prioritety / pod nauch. red. I.M. Bratishcheva = . A strong state is the choice of Russia. Threats, values, priorities / under scientific. ed. THEM. Bratishchev. Moscow: Publishing and Trade Corporation "Dashkov and K"; 2019. 460 p. (In Russ.)

10. Balatskiy Ye.V. Problems of assessing the scale and effectiveness of state participation in the economy. «Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta Seriya 6, Ekonomika» = "Bulletin of Moscow University Series 6, Economics".1997; 6: 22–44. (In Russ.)

11. Balatskiy Ye.V. Elementy ekonomiki gosudarstvennogo sektora = Elements of public sector economics [Internet]. Moscow: CAPITAL OF THE COUNTRY; 2013. Available from: http://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/elementy_ekonomiki_gosudarstvennogo_sektora/. (In Russ.)

12. Yakovlev I.P. On "points of growth" in sociology. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological studies. 1999; 1: 14-20. (In Russ.)

13. Davydov A.A. Modul'nyy analiz i konstruirovaniye sotsiuma = Modular analysis and construction of society. Moscow: ISAN; 1994. (In Russ.)

14. Davydov A.A. Decreasing numerical sequences in sociology: facts, explanations, forecasts. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological research. 2001; 7: 113-119. (In Russ.)

15. Maslikhina V.YU. Permissible level of interregional inequality in Russia. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i upravleniye = Bulletin of the Volga State Technological University. Series Economics and Management. 2014; 4 (23): 15-22. (In Russ.)

16. Pautova L.A. . On the question of the methodology for calculating indicators and threshold values of social stability. Matematicheskiye struktury i modelirovaniye = Mathematical structures and modeling. 1998; 2: 124-127. (In Russ.)

17. Shreyder YU.A. Works on the history and methodology of science. Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Lyubishchev. Leningrad: Science; 1982. (In Russ.)

18. Churakov A.N. On some mathematical relationships between the parameters of frequency distributions. Sotsiologiya: 4M = Sociology: 4M. 2001; 14: 130-150. (In Russ.)

19. Soroko E.M. Zolotyye secheniya, protsessy samoorganizatsii i evolyutsii sistem: Vvedeniye v obshchuyu teoriyu garmonii sistem. Izd. 4-ye = Golden sections, processes of self-organization and evolution of systems: An introduction to the general theory of harmony of systems. Ed. 4th. Moscow: Book house "LIBROKOM"; 2012. 264 p. (In Russ.)

20. Sukhonos S.I. Large-scale harmony of the universe. Moscow: Novyy Tsentr = New Center; 2002. 253 p. (In Russ.)

21. Churakov A.N. On the specifics of modal groups in frequency distributions. Sotsiologiya: 4M = Sociology: 4M. 1999; 11: 179-198. (In Russ.)

22. Davydov A.A. Analysis of one-dimensional frequency distributions in sociology: the evolution of approaches. Metodika i tekhnika sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy = Methodology and technique of sociological research. 1995: 113-116. (In Russ.)

23. Vyatkin V.B. Chaos and order of discrete systems in the light of synergetic information theory [Internet]. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU = Scientific journal of KubSAU. 2009; 03(47). Available from: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2009/03/pdf/08.pdf. (In Russ.)

24. Sukhonos S.I. Kvantovaya garmoniya = Quantum harmony. Moscow: Publishing house "Public education"; 2018. 224 p. (In Russ.)

25. Obshcherossiyskiy klassifikator organizatsionnopravovykh form OK 028-2012 (utv. Prikazom Rosstandarta ot 16.10.2012 № 505-st) (red. ot 24.10.2018) = All-Russian classifier of organizational and legal forms OK 028-2012 (approved by the Order of Rosstandart dated 16.10.2012 No. 505-st) (revised from 24.10.2018) [Internet]. Available from: Consultant.ru›document/cons_doc_LAW_139192. (In Russ.)

26. Godovoy otchet PAO Sberbank za 2018 god = Annual report of Sberbank PJSC for 2018 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sberbank.com/common/img/uploaded/redirected/com/gosa2019/docs/sberbank-annual_report_2018_rus.pdf. (In Russ.)

27. Federal'nyy zakon «O bankakh i bankovskoy deyatel'nosti» = Federal Law "On Banks and Banking Activities". Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)

28. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye pokazateli Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 1991- 2018 gg = Socioeconomic indicators of the Russian Federation in 1991-2018. Federal State Statistics Service. Appendix to the Yearbook - 2019. Electronic version [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gks.ru/folder/210/document/13396. (In Russ.)

29. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy yezhegodnik 2018 = Russian Statistical Yearbook 2018. Moscow: Rosstat; 2018. 694 p. (In Russ.)

30. Rossiyskiy statisticheskiy yezhegodnik 2019