Regional comparisons of the accessibility and use of ICT in the regions of Russia: the possibility of using integrated indicators

The aim of the study. The aim of the study is a statistical analysis of the accessibility and the use of information and communication technologies for the population and households based on the developed integrated indices in the regional aspect.

Fundamental international documents refer to the increasing role of information in all spheres of society, and indicate that the number of the poorest households with, for example, a mobile phone is higher than that with the access to clean drinking water.

Thus, it can be noted that the level of accessibility and use of information and communication technologies is a priority for the development of both individual countries and the world community as a whole.

Materials and methods. Methods of grouping and multidimensional classification, analysis of variation, normalizing, construction of multidimensional averages and correlation analysis, as well as tabular and graphical methods of visual representation of the results of the study were used as statistical tools for the study. Microsoft Excel was used to process the primary information.

Results. Comparison of currently used indicators has revealed the need to develop and build integrated indices in four main areas of ICT research: infrastructure (physical and information), ICT accessibility (physical and price affordability), the use of ICT (by the population and households, enterprises and organizations, in the public sector), knowledge and skills (education, digital skills). In this study, the analysis was carried out according to the characteristics of the accessibility and the use of ICT for the population and households. The results of the study at the federal district level led to the conclusion that, despite the existence of a unified policy in the field of ICT development and information society at the federal level, there are significant differences in the management of this process and the level of implementation of system development measures for ICT in individual federal districts and regions. The main result of the study is the classification of regions by levels of accessibility and use of ICT. The analysis revealed a significant direct relationship between the components of ICT accessibility and its use. The ratings based on the calculated multidimensional averages allowed us to reveal the leader and lagging regions of the Russian Federation in terms of the development of ICT and information society.

Conclusion. According to the results of the statistical research positions of regions of the Russian Federation on the accessibility levels and the use of information and communication technologies were determined, as well as a direct relationship between the indices of accessibility and the use of ICT was revealed as a whole in the Russian Federation, and in individual federal districts.

1. The state program «Scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation» was approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2019 No. 377. (In Russ.)

2. The state program of the Russian Federation «Information Society (2011–2020)» Approved by the Government of the Russian Federation on April 15, 2014. No. 313. (In Russ.)

3. The National Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” Approved by the minutes of the meeting of the Presidium of the Presidential Council on Strategic Development and National Projects dated June 4, 2019 No. 7. (In Russ.)

4. Message from the President to the Federal Assembly 12/01/2016 // President of Russia [Internet]. Available from: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/53379). (In Russ.)

5. The development strategy of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030, approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 9, 2017. No. 203 “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030” (In Russ.)

6. Arkhipova M.Yu., Sirotin V.P., Sukhareva N.A. Development of a composite indicator for measuring the magnitude and dynamics of digital inequality in Russia. Voprosy statistiki = Statistics Issues. 2018; 4: 75–87. (In Russ.)

7. Sokolova A.V., Mikova N.S., Gutaruk Ye.V. i dr. Atlas tekhnologiy budushchego pod red. L.M. Gokhberga; Natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» = National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Tochka Publishing Group, Alpina Publisher Publishing House; 2017. 192 p. (In Russ.)

8. Bychkova S.G., Parshintseva L.S. Information and communication technologies as the basis for the development of the information society: Russia in the system of international statistical indicators. Statistika i ekonomika = Statistics and Economics. 2019; 16; 1: 32–40. (In Russ.)

9. Bychkova S.G., Parshintseva L.S. Deprivations in the modern world: digital aspects. V sbornike: «Informatsiya kak dvigatel’ nauchnogo progressa» sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii = In the collection: “Information as an engine of scientific progress” collection of articles of the International scientific and practical conference. 2019: 86–92. (In Russ.)

10. Dneprovskaya N.V. Study of the transition to the digital economy. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta G.V. Plekhanova = Bulletin of the Russian University of Economics G.V. Plekhanov. 2019; 4 (106): 54–65. (In Russ.)

11. Dronov V.N., Makhrova O.N. Digital inequality of the Ryazan region: monograph. Sankt-Peterburgskiy un-t upravleniya i ekonomiki, Institut sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh problem narodonaseleniya RAN = St. Petersburg University of Management and Economics, Institute of Social and Economic Population Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the St. Petersburg University of Management and Economics; 2015. (In Russ.)

12. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Gokhberg L.M., Kovaleva G.G. i dr. Metodologicheskiye rekomendatsii po issledovaniyu struktury i razmera internet-ekonomiki v Rossii, Nats.issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» = Methodological recommendations on the study of the structure and size of the Internet economy in Russia, National Research. University «Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE; 2016. 64 p. 500 copies. (In Russ.)

13. G20 DETF. G20 Digital Economy Development and Cooperation Initiative. [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2016/g20-digital-economy-development-andcooperation.pdf (cited: 01.06.2018).

14. Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management science. 1996; 42; 4: 541–558.

15. Solow R.M. We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review. 1987. 36 p.

16. Tapscott, D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. NewYork: McGraw-Hill. 1994. 368 p.

17. YEMISS Gosudarstvennaya statistika = EMISS State statistics [Internet]. Available from: https://fedstat.ru/. (In Russ.)

18. Monitoring regional’noy informatizatsii = Monitoring of regional informatization [Internet]. Available from: https://digital.gov.ru/ru/activity/directions/783/. (In Russ.)

19. Indeks «Tsifrovaya Rossiya» = The Digital Russia Index [Internet]. Available from: https://finance.skolkovo.ru/ru/sfice/researchreports/1779-2019-04-22/. (In Russ.)

20. Tsifrovaya Gramotnost’ = Digital Literacy [Internet]. Available from: http://tsifrovayagramotnost’.rf/. (In Russ.)