Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Methods of evaluation the quality of teaching in higher education institutions

https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-6-36-45

Abstract

Purpose of research. The article describes an approach to assessing the quality of education at universities. Innovative processes in higher education increase the requirements to the quality assurance system for bachelors, masters, specialists and postgraduates. Such a system includes not only educational processes, but also the results of the quality of education. This problem is relevant because the quality of students’ training influences the formation of professional competencies and the demand on the labor market directly. The aim of the study is to develop a methodology for assessing the quality of training for different groups of experts.

Materials and methods. The method of quality assessment and the results of the study, based on the proposed pyramid model of quality assessment with the details of the components, included in its composition, and the designation of their values for evaluation are considered in the paper. A method of assessing the quality of education at universities, based on the criteria of quality of education, the method of expert evaluation, formalization and algorithmization of the process is proposed. The generalized assessment of the group of experts is formed on the basis of average values. Formalization of assessment begins with the fact that in the built pyramid of quality of training each criterion is assigned a variable that reflects its assessment. The indicator, which is characterized by the average values of experts' assessments, is an assessment of the quality of training. Setting the relationship between quantitative and qualitative value is carried out using the established quality scale, which is based on the Likert scale. For a clear understanding of how the conclusion about the degree of consistency of experts by Kendall method is formed, the situation is considered when experts are asked to rank the criteria by significance, that is, to assign a place in the rating for each criterion. The overall assessment of the quality of education can be obtained based on a questionnaire that should be conducted on a specific topic and for all participants in the educational process, followed by an analysis of the survey results. Each expert group is offered a list of questions on a specific topic. To solve this problem, we should use the method of expert assessments, which is part of the theory of decision-making and expert evaluation - the procedure for obtaining an assessment of the task based on the opinion of experts, followed by decision-making.

Results. The interest of the employer in carrying out this study is to increase the effectiveness of the quality of training, the formation of professional competencies, as well as an objective comprehensive assessment of the quality of training. As a result of the study, the pyramid of criteria and the model of evaluation of the quality of education allow to determine the value that reflects the qualitative characteristics of the learning process in higher education.

Conclusion. The introduction of this model will improve the quality of the educational process in the University, to prepare highly qualified specialists in demand in the labor market, meet the needs of socio-economic development of modern society.

About the Authors

Irina V. Barannikova
NITU «MISIS»
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor

Moscow



Elena N. Shaforostova
NITU «MISIS»
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor

Moscow



References

1. Ivanchenko I.V. The problem of improving the quality of education in high school. Molodoy uchenyy = Young scientist. 2016; 5. 1: 18-21. [Internet] Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/109/26315/(In Russ.)

2. Esenbayeva G.A., Kakenov K.S. Evaluation of factors affecting the quality of education in high school. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016; 2-2: 241-244. (In Russ.)

3. Terent’yeva T.V., Kulakova M.N. Factors affecting the effectiveness of educational services of the university in modern society. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2012; 5. (In Russ.)

4. Rënts B., Fërster E. Metody korrelyatsionnogo i regressionnogo analiza. Rukovodstvo dlya ekonomistov. Perevod s nemetskogo i predisloviye V.M. Ivanovoy = Methods of correlation and regression analysis. A guide for economists. Translation from German and preface by V.M. Ivanova. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 1983: 175. (In Russ.)

5. Templin J., Bradshaw L. The Use and Misuse of Psychometric Models. Psychometrika. 2014; 79 (2): 347-354.

6. Barannikova I.V., Lander A.V. Metrologiya, standartizatsiya, sertifikatsiya v ASU: Uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov = Metrology, standardization, certification in ACS: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow State Mining University; 2004. 91 p. (In Russ.)

7. Chernaya YU.A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the university in connection with the introduction of criteria for assessing the quality of educational services. Fundamental Research. 2014; 12-9: 1999-2002. (In Russ.)

8. Rudenko S.S. Evaluation of the quality of education in high school. Vestnik CHitGU = Bulletin of ChitU. 2008; 2 (47): 21-34. (In Russ.)

9. Zaborova E. N. Evaluation of the quality of education: the opinion of teachers of the economic university. XX Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya pamyati professora L. N. Kogana «Kul’tura, lichnost’, obshchestvo v sovremennom mire: Metodologiya, opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya» = XX International Conference in memory of Professor L. N. Kogan "Culture, personality, society in the modern world: Methodology, experience of empirical research" (March 16-18, 2017, Yekaterinburg). Yekaterinburg: UrFU; 2017: 1027-1038. (In Russ.)

10. Zvonnikov V.I., CHelyshkova M.B. Kontrol’ kachestva obucheniya pri attestatsii: Kompetentnostnyy podkhod = Control of the quality of training in certification: Competencebased approach. Moscow: University book; Logos, 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)

11. Maslova L.D. On the systems of quality assessment of higher education. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal = International Research Journal. 2012; 3 (3): 64-69. (In Russ.)

12. Musikhin I.A. Modern approaches to the monitoring of the quality of educational results at the university. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta geosistem i tekhnologiy = Bulletin of the Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies. 2013; 1 (21). (In Russ.)

13. Malkhorta Neresh K. Marketingovyye issledovaniya. Prakticheskoye rukovodstvo, 3-e izdaniye. Per. s angl. = Marketing research. A practical guide, 3rd edition. Per. from English Moscow: Williams Publishing House; 2002. 960 p. ISBN 5-8459-0357-2 (In Russ.)

14. Kitsenko M.M., Barannikova I.V. Nauchnaya rabota «Razrabotka metodiki otsenki kachestva obucheniya v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh» = Scientific work "Development of methods for assessing the quality of education in higher education." Moscow: NITU «MISiS», 2018. (In Russ.)

15. Stepanov M. N., SHavrin A. V. Statisticheskiye metody obrabotki rezul’tatov mekhanicheskikh ispytaniy: spravochnik. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. = Statistical methods for processing the results of mechanical tests: a handbook. 2nd ed., Corr. and add. Moscow: Mechanical Engineering; 2005. 399 p. ISBN 5-217-03272-3 (In Russ.)

16. Zaytseva I.A. Pedagogicheskiye problemy formirovaniya poznavatel’nykh interesov uchashchikhsya = Pedagogical problems of formation of cognitive interests of students. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1988. 200 p. (In Russ.)

17. Broydo V.L., Il’ina O.P. Vychislitel’nyye sistemy, seti i telekommunikatsii: Uchebnik dlya vuzov = Computing systems, networks and telecommunications: A textbook for universities. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2011. 560 p. (In Russ.)

18. Sedykh I.YU. Otsenka kachestva obucheniya v sovremennom vuze. Sovremennaya matematika i kontseptsii innovatsionnogo matematicheskogo obrazovaniya = Evaluation of the quality of education in the modern university. Modern mathematics and concepts of innovative mathematics education. Moscow: MFO Publishing House, 2016. ISSN: 2412-9895. (In Russ.)

19. YArkova S.A., Zalutskiy M.A. Metodika vnedreniya professional’nykh standartov. Ekonomika i upravleniye: analiz tendentsiy i perspektiv razvitiya: sbornik materialov XXXVI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Economics and Management: analysis of trends and development prospects: collection of materials of the XXXVI International Scientific and Practical Conference (Novosibirsk, July 21, August 17, 2017) Center for the Development of Scientific Cooperation (CRNS); under the general editorship of Candidate of Economic Sciences S. Chernova. Novosibirsk: CRNS Publishing House; 2017. 143 p. ISBN 978-5-00068-889-2. (In Russ.)

20. Puzankov D., Fedorov I., SHadrikov V. A look at the development of the system of higher professional education. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. 2004; 9: 14– 18. (In Russ.)

21. Ivanchenko I. V. The problem of improving the quality of education in high school. Molodoy uchenyy = Young scientist. 2016; 5.1: 18-21. [Internet] Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/109/26315. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Barannikova I.V., Shaforostova E.N. Methods of evaluation the quality of teaching in higher education institutions. Statistics and Economics. 2018;15(6):36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-6-36-45

Views: 1892


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)