Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Dynamics structure of modern innovative enterprise

https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2016-5-57-62

Abstract

New trends in the modern interpretation of the concept of «enterprise» is related to its development over time, a change in its structure as a result of adaptation to the dynamic environment, with the establishment of links with other organizations and enterprises. In this case, ontologies play a key role as a tool for providing «cross-cultural» (in the technical sense) between systems. The article highlights the problem of merging and splitting of ontologies, viewed as a necessary condition for the survival of enterprises in the conditions, when there is a merger or division. Was taken ontology and formal analysis was applied concepts for example, the restructuring of the commercial bank. Formal analysis of concepts we used to find a set of concepts, which will be a way to merge the local ontologies in the global financial ontology. Environmental changes occur very often and quickly. Adaptation and modification of ontologies for the socialized enterprises is very labor costs, as they require semantic information processing. We decided to use the method of formal analysis of concepts, since it allows you to apply a certain degree of process automation.

About the Authors

D. V. Novototskih
Consulting company Accenture Global, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Leading Specialist, Global сonsulting company Accenture



V. P. Romanov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Doctorate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department for Computer Science, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics



M. S. Safonova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer of the Department for Computer Science, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics



References

1. Antonia Albani, Jan L.G. Dietz. Enterprise ontology based development of information systems. Int. J. Internet and Enterprise Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2011. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/export/DL/214261.pdf

2. Hui Liu, Anne-Françoise, Cutting-Decelle, and Jean-Pierre Bourey. Use of Ontology for Solving InteroperabilityProblems between Enterprises. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01055925/document

3. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C Member Submission 22 November 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/

4. Wille, R. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, рр.445–470. 1982.

5. Serhiy A. Yevtushenko. System of data analysis «Concept Explorer». (In Russian). Proceedings of the 7th national conference on Artificial Intelligence KII-2000, p. 127–134, Russia, 2000.

6. Gerd Stumme, Alexander Maedche, Ontology Merging for Federated Ontologies on the Semantic Web, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-47/stumme.pdf

7. Financial Ontology http://www.fadyart.com/ontologies/data/Finance.owl

8. Baranov SPIIRAS Proceedings. 2012. Issue 4(23). ISSN 2078-9181 (print), ISSN 2078-9599 (online).


Review

For citations:


Novototskih D.V., Romanov V.P., Safonova M.S. Dynamics structure of modern innovative enterprise. Statistics and Economics. 2016;(5):57-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2016-5-57-62

Views: 942


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)