Preview

Statistics and Economics

Advanced search

Information Content Assessment of the Federal Budget and the Budget Process in the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2022-4-14-34

Abstract

This article is devoted to the results of a statistical study of the composition of federal budget expenditures (the object of the study) from the standpoint of assessing its information content (the subject of the study). In the opinion of its authors, the issues of information content of budget decisions remain out of due attention not only from the participants of the budget process, but also in the practice of public administration in general. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to form scientifically based tools for assessing the information content, determining its quantitative indicators, clarifying the nature, hidden features and balance in the distribution of federal budget expenditures.

Materials and methods. The analysis of the composition parameters of federal budget expenditures was carried out on the basis of statistical data of the Federal Treasury for 2014-2020. The theoretical foundations and research methods are developed based on the authors’ preferences regarding the results of conceptual and applied developments of domestic scientists in the field of synergetic information theory, structural analysis of systems, and modular theory of society. Quantitative methods of processing the initial data, tabular and graphical methods of visualizing the results of the study were used. Standard Microsoft Office application software packages were used to solve the research tasks.

Results. Indexes of information content of the multicomponent systems’ composition and algorithms for their calculations are formed. Quantitative criteria are determined and a model for optimizing the composition of federal budget expenditures is presented. The comparison of actual and model indexes of the information content is presented as a way to adjust priorities in the composition of federal budget expenditures; as a way to develop tactics and strategies for the transition from the actual parameters of the expenditures’ composition to the “best” distribution, which is described by a quantitative model of the optimal combination of the scales of its components. Retrospective optimization options based on the results of the execution of expenditures in 2020 and promising options for optimizing the distribution of federal budget expenditures in 2022-2024 have been established.

Conclusion. Assessment of the information content and optimization of the components’ scale of the budget expenditures’ composition are recognized as elements of management of the distribution of public resources in the budget process, ways to ensure control over the effectiveness of budget decisions and can be useful for participants in the budget process both at the stage of formation and at the stage of execution of budget expenditures.

About the Authors

O. V. Morozov
Higher School of Public Policy; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; Federation Council of Federal Assembly of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Oleg V. Morozov - Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Head of Higher School of Public Policy, Member of Council of Federation of Federal Assembly of Russian Federation Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Moscow



M. A. Vasiliev
Higher School of Public Policy; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Mikhail A. Vasiliev - Deputy Head of the Higher School of Public Policy Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Moscow



References

1. Natsional’nyye scheta Rossii v 2013-2020 godakh: Stat. sb./H35 Rosstat = National accounts of Russia in 2013-2020: Stat. Sat/H35 Rosstat. Moscow: Rosstat; 2021. 429 p. (In Russ.)

2. Agafonova M. YU. Bol’shoy ekonomicheskiy slovar’: Pod red. A. N. Azriliyana. 2-ye izd = Big Economic Dictionary: Ed. A. N. Azrilyana. 2nd ed. Moscow: Institute of New Economics; 1997. 856 p. (In Russ.)

3. Zherebilo T. V. Terminy i ponyatiya: Metody issledovaniya i analiza teksta: Slovar’-spravochnik = Terms and concepts: Methods of research and text analysis: Dictionary-reference book. Nazran: Pilgrim LLC; 2011. (In Russ.)

4. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4-kh t. / RAN, In-t lingvistich. issledovaniy; Pod red. A. P. Yevgen’yevoy. 4-ye izd.= Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 volumes / RAS, Institute of Linguistics. research; Ed. A. P. Evgenieva. 4th ed. Moscow: Polygraph resources; 1999. (In Russ.)

5. Dmitrevskaya I. V. Tekst kak sistema: ponimaniye, slozhnost’, informativnost’ = Text as a system: understanding, complexity, information content. Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University; 1985. 88 p. (In Russ.)

6. Dmitrevskaya I. V. System-hermeneutic analysis of the problem of the meaning of human existence. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki = Bulletin of the Ivanovo State University. Series: Humanities. 2008; 2(8): 22-31. (In Russ.)

7. Dridze T. M. YAzyk i sotsial’naya psikhologiya = Language and social psychology. Moscow: LIBROKOM; 2009. 240 p. (In Russ.)

8. Khaydegger M. On the question of the purpose of thinking. Filosofiya soznaniya v XX veke = hilosophy of consciousness in the XX century. 1994. (In Russ.)

9. Shalanov N. V. Sistemnyy analiz. kibernetika. sinergetika: matematicheskiye metody i modeli. Ekonomicheskiye aspekty = System analysis. cybernetics. synergetics: mathematical methods and models. Economic aspects. Novosibirsk: NGTU; 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)

10. Baranova I. V. The use of entropy in evaluating the effectiveness of government bodies in the field of public finance. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School. Novosibirsk. 2009; 6(77): 22-25. (In Russ.)

11. Vyatkin V. B. Synergetic theory of information. Part 1. Synergetic approach to determining the amount of information [Internet]. KubGAU = KubGAU. 2008; 44(10): 1-24. Available from: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2008/10/pdf/12.pdf. (In Russ.)

12. Vyatkin V. B. Synergetic theory of information. Part 2. Reflection of discrete systems in the plane of signs of their description [Internet].KubGAU = KubGAU. 2009; 45(1): 1-30. Available from: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2009/01/pdf/12.pdf. (In Russ.)

13. Vyatkin V. B. Chaos and the order of discrete systems in the light of synergetic information theory. KubGAU = KubGAU. 2009: 03(47). (In Russ.)

14. Davydov A. A. Decreasing numerical sequences in sociology: facts, explanations, forecasts. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological research. 2001; 7: 113-119. (In Russ.)

15. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Kaznacheystva Rossii. Ispolneniye federal’nogo byudzheta v 2020 godu = Official website of the Treasury of Russia. Execution of the federal budget in 2020 [Internet]. Available from: https://roskazna.gov.ru/ispolneniebyudzhetov/federalnyj-byudzhet/. (In Russ.)

16. Osnovnyye napravleniya byudzhetnoy, nalogovoy i tamozhenno-tarifnoy politiki na 2020 god i na planovyy period 2021 i 2022 godov = The main directions of the budget, tax and customs tariff policy for 2020 and for the planning period of 2021 and 2022 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_334706/9259139c7f62fb3c1df93036e9404db3fcf83241/. (In Russ.)

17. Soroko E. M. Zolotyye secheniya, protsessy samoorganizatsii i evolyutsii sistem: Vvedeniye v obshchuyu teoriyu garmonii sistem. Izd. 4-ye. = Golden sections, processes of self-organization and evolution of systems: Introduction to the general theory of systems harmony. Ed. 4 th. Moscow: LIBROKOM; 2012. 264 p. (In Russ.)

18. Vasilenko S. L. Golden section as the beginning of useful structures. Akademiya Trinitarizma = Academy of Trinitarianism. Moscow; El № 77-6567, publ.17512, 09.06.2012. (In Russ.)

19. Shenyagin V. P. Optimality in harmony. Akademiya Trinitarizma = Academy of Trinitarianism; Moscow; El № 77-6567, publ.17967, 03.04.2013. (In Russ.)

20. Churakov A. N. On the specifics of modal groups in frequency distributions. Sotsiologiya: 4M = Sociology: 4M. 1999; 11: 179-198. (In Russ.)

21. Churakov A. N. On some mathematical dependencies between the parameters of frequency distributions. Sotsiologiya: 4M = Sociology: 4M. 2001; 14: 130-150. (In Russ.)

22. Yakovlev I. P. On “points of growth” in sociology. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological research. 1999; 1: 14-20. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Morozov O.V., Vasiliev M.A. Information Content Assessment of the Federal Budget and the Budget Process in the Russian Federation. Statistics and Economics. 2022;19(4):14-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2022-4-14-34

Views: 424


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3925 (Print)