<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">umovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Статистика и Экономика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Statistics and Economics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2500-3925</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Plekhanov Russian University of Economics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21686/2500-3925-2021-2-45-56</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">umovest-1544</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ СТАТИСТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMIC STATISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Assessment of Digitalization of Interaction Between the State and Citizens</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-4936</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Добролюбова</surname><given-names>Е. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dobrolyubova</surname><given-names>E. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Елена Игоревна Добролюбова - К.э.н., ведущий научный сотрудник Центра технологий государственного управления Института прикладных экономических  исследований</p><p>Москва</p><p>SPIN-код: 6712-3874</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elena I. Dobrolyubova - Cand. Sci. (Economics), lead  researcher, Center for Public Administration Technologies, Institute of Applied Economic Science</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">dobrolyubova-ei@ranepa.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-0919</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Старостина</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Starostina</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Александра Николаевна Старостина - Младший научный  сотрудник Центра технологий государственного  управления Института прикладных экономических  исследований</p><p>Москва</p><p>SPIN-код: 7195-3857</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexandra N. Starostina - Junior researcher, Center for Public Administration Technologies, Institute of Applied Economic  Science</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">starostina-an@ranepa.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Добролюбова Е.И., Старостина А.Н., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Добролюбова Е.И., Старостина А.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dobrolyubova E.I., Starostina A.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://statecon.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1544">https://statecon.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1544</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью исследования является выработка комплексного подхода к оценке цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан в сфере оказания государственных услуг. В задачи исследования входит анализ действующих российских и зарубежных подходов к оценке цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан; разработка и апробация методологии комплексного показателя для проведения такой оценки в сфере оказания государственных услуг. Материалы и методы. При подготовке статьи авторами изучены российские и зарубежные теоретические и практические подходы к оценке цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан. Апробация предложенного в статье индекса цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан проведена на основе данных выборочного федерального статистического наблюдения Федеральной службы государственной статистики по вопросам использования населением информационных технологий и информационно-коммуникационных сетей, а также данных Министерства экономического развития Российской Федерации. Для достижения цели использованы теоретические методы (сравнительный анализ, синтез, обобщение), моделирование и корреляционный анализ. Результаты. Исходя из анализа зарубежных и российских подходов, их преимуществ и ограничений, в статье обоснована методология расчета индекса цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан, учитывающего непосредственные результаты (наличие государственных и муниципальных услуг в электронном виде), промежуточные результаты (востребованность электронной формы оказания услуг) и конечные результаты цифровой трансформации в сфере оказания государственных услуг (удовлетворенность граждан качеством оказываемых услуг в электронном виде), а также риски цифрового взаимодействия (уровень цифрового доверия граждан при взаимодействии с государством). Проведена апробация индекса цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан в региональном разрезе. Для оценки применимости предложенного индекса исследована корреляционная зависимость его значений и значений компонентов индекса от уровня образования населения, занятости, доходов и урбанизации, так и различиями в доступности инфраструктуры информационно-коммуникационных технологий. При этом уровень корреляции цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан с социальными факторами выше, чем с инфраструктурными. Это означает, что для решения проблемы цифрового неравенства российских регионов недостаточно обеспечить универсальный доступ к сети Интернет; важную роль в продвижении цифровых каналов взаимодействия играют и факторы развития человеческого капитала. Заключение. Оценка цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан требует учета различных показателей, отражающих непосредственные, промежуточные и конечные результаты такого взаимодействия, а также риски, связанные с переходом к «цифре». В части оказания государственных услуг для такой оценки целесообразно использовать индекс цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан. Дальнейшие перспективные направления исследований в сфере оценки цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан связаны с изучением влияния доверия граждан к органам государственного управления на уровень цифровизации взаимодействия государства и граждан, а также с учетом взаимодействия граждан и государства в рамках иных видов государственных функций (выработки и реализации государственной политики, регулирования, контрольно-надзорной деятельности). Реализация этих направлений потребует расширения имеющейся в настоящее время информационной базы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive approach to evaluating digitalization of interaction of the state and citizens in the sphere of providing state services. The objectives of the study include the analysis of current Russian and foreign approaches to assessing the digitalization of interaction between the state and citizens; development and testing of a composite indicator methodology for conducting such an assessment in the provision of public services. Materials and methods. When preparing the paper, the authors studied Russian and foreign theoretical and practical approaches to evaluating digitalization of interaction between the state and citizens. The approbation of the digitalization index of interaction between the state and citizens proposed in the article was carried out on the basis of data from a selective federal statistical observation of the Federal State Statistics Service on the use of information technologies, information and communication networks by the population, as well as the data from the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. To achieve the objective, theoretical methods (comparative analysis, synthesis, and generalization), modelling, and correlation analysis were used. Results. Based on the analysis of foreign and Russian approaches, their advantages and limitations, the article substantiates the methodology for calculating the digitalization index of interaction between the state and citizens, taking into account the immediate results (the availability of state and municipal services in the electronic form), intermediate results (the demand for the electronic form of service provision) and the final results of digital transformation in the provision of public services (satisfaction of citizens with the quality of services provided in the electronic form), as well as the risks of digital interaction (the level of digital trust of citizens in the interaction with the state). Approbation of the digitalization index of interaction between the state and citizens in the regional context was carried out. To assess the applicability of the proposed index, the correlation dependence of its values and the values of the index components on the level of education of the population, employment, income and urbanization, as well as differences in the availability of information and communication technologies infrastructure was investigated. At the same time, the level of digitalization correlation of interaction between the state and citizens with social factors is higher than with infrastructural ones. This means that to solve the problem of digital inequality in Russian regions, it is not enough to provide universal access to the Internet; factors of human capital development also play an important role in promoting digital channels of interaction. Conclusion. Assessing the digitalization of interaction between the state and citizens requires taking into account various indicators that reflect the immediate, intermediate and final results of such an interaction, as well as the risks associated with the transition to “digit”. In terms of the provision of public services for such an assessment, it is advisable to use the digitalization index of interaction between the state and citizens. Further promising areas of research in the field of assessing the digitalization of interaction between the state and citizens are related to the study of the influence of citizens’ trust in government bodies on the level of digitalization of interaction between the state and citizens, as well as taking into account the interaction of citizens and the state within the framework of other types of state functions (development and implementation of state policy, regulation, control and supervisory activities). The implementation of these directions will require the expansion of the currently available information base.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>государственное управление</kwd><kwd>государственные услуги</kwd><kwd>граждане</kwd><kwd>показатели цифровизации государственного управления</kwd><kwd>цифровая трансформация</kwd><kwd>цифровое неравенство</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>public administration</kwd><kwd>public services</kwd><kwd>citizens</kwd><kwd>indicators of digitalization of public administration</kwd><kwd>digital transformation</kwd><kwd>digital divide</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The article was prepared on the basis of RANEPA research programme.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2016. 346 p. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2016; 346 p. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Janssen M., Estevez E. Lean government and platform-based governance -Doing more with less // Government Information Quarterly. 2013. № 30. С. 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Janssen M., Estevez E. Lean government and platform-based governance -Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly. 2013; 30: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cordella A., Paletti A. ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic // Information Polity. 2018. № 23(2). С. 1–17. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170061.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cordella A., Paletti A. ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic. Information Polity. 2018; 23(2): 1-17. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170061.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">UN. United Nations E-Government Survey Report. 2020. [Электрон. ресурс] Режим доступа: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/publication/2020-united-nations-egovernment-survey.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">UN. United Nations E-Government Survey Report. 2020. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/publication/2020-united-nations-e-governmentsurvey.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Александров О.В., Клочкова Е.Н., Минашкин В.Г., Садовникова Н.А. Методология формирования системы статистических показателей эффективности развития сферы информационно-коммуникационных технологий монография. М.: МЭСИ, 2012. 181 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aleksandrov O.V., Klochkova Ye.N., Minashkin V.G., Sadovnikova N.A. Metodologiya formirovaniya sistemy statisticheskikh pokazateley effektivnosti razvitiya sfery informatsionnokommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy monografiya = Methodology for the formation of a system of statistical indicators of the effectiveness of the development of the sphere of information and communication technologies monograph. Moscow: MESI, 2012. 181 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Минэкономразвития России. Результаты мониторинга качества перевода государственных услуг в электронную форму в 2019 году. [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://ar.gov.ru/ru-RU/document/default/view/575.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii. Rezul’taty monitoringa kachestva perevoda gosudarstvennykh uslug v elektronnuyu formu v 2019 godu = Ministry of Economic Development of Russia. Results of monitoring the quality of the transfer of public services into electronic form in 2019 [Internet]. Available from: https://ar.gov.ru/ru-RU/document/default/view/575. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кабанов Ю.А., Панфилов Г.О., Чугунов А.В. Мониторинг ресурсов электронного участия: методика и некоторые результаты // Государство и граждане в электронной среде. 2020. № 4. С. 61–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kabanov YU.A., Panfilov G.O., ChugunovA.V. Monitoring of e-participation resources: methodology and some results. Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoy srede = State and citizens in the electronic environment. 2020; 4: 61-72. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pérez-Morote R., Pontones-Rosa C., Núñez-Chicharro M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries // Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change. 2020. №. 154. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pérez-Morote R., Pontones-Rosa C., Núñez-Chicharro M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting &amp; Social Change. 2020; 154. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьева Л.C., Кудина М.В., Воронов А.С., Сергеев С.С. Формирование национального цифрового суверенитета в условиях дифференциации пространственного развития // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2021. № 84. С. 277–299.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont’yeva L.C., Kudina M.V., Voronov A.S., Sergeyev S.S. Formation of national digital sovereignty in the context of differentiation of spatial development. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik = Public Administration. Electronic bulletin. 2021; 84: 277-299. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Былина С.Г. Региональные особенности и детерминанты использования электронных услуг сельским населением // Проблемы развития территории. 2018. № 5(97). C. 84–98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylina S.G. Regional features and determinants of the use of electronic services by the rural population. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of territory development. 2018; 5(97): 84–98. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Добролюбова Е.И., Южаков В.Н. Мониторинг и оценка результативности и эффективности цифровизации государственного управления: методические подходы. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2020: 154 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobrolyubova Ye.I., Yuzhakov V.N. Monitoring i otsenka rezul’tativnosti i effektivnosti tsifrovizatsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: metodicheskiye podkhody = Monitoring and Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Digitalization of Public Administration: Methodological Approaches. Moscow: Publishing house «Delo» RANEPA; 2020: 154 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жигун Л.А., Покровская Т.И. Проблемы неудовлетворенности населения государственными электронными услугами // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2021. № 1. С. 148–167.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhigun L.A., Pokrovskaya T.I. Problems of dissatisfaction of the population with state electronic services. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Problems of theory and practice of management. 2021; 1: 148-167. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bannister F., Connolly R. ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research // Government Information Quarterly. 2014. № 31(1). С. 119–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bannister F., Connolly R. ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly. 2014; 31(1): 119-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Le Blanc D. E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: www.un.org/development/desa/publications/working-paper/wp163/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Le Blanc D. E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends [Internet]. Available from: www.un.org/development/desa/publications/working-paper/wp163/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Australian Bureau of Statistics [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/Home/Assuring%20Census%20Data%20Quality.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Australian Bureau of Statistics [Internet]. Available from: www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/Home/Assuring%20Census%20Data%20Quality.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Independent Report on E-Voting in Estonia [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: estoniaevoting.org/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Independent Report on E-Voting in Estonia [Internet]. Available from: estoniaevoting.org/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">EC. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020 [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">EC. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020 [Internet]. Available from: ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nguyen T.T., Phan D.M., Le A.H., Nguyen L.T.N. The determinants of citizens’ satisfaction of E-government: An empirical study in Vietnam // Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020/ № 7(8). С. 519–531. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.519/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nguyen T.T., Phan D.M., Le A.H., Nguyen L.T.N. The determinants of citizens’ satisfaction of E-government: An empirical study in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020; 7(8): 519-531. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.519/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weerakkody V., Irani Z., Lee H., Hindi N., Osman I. Are U.K. Citizens Satisfied With E-Government Services? Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction // Information Systems Management. 2016. № 33(4). С. 331–343. DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weerakkody V., Irani Z., Lee H., Hindi N., Osman I. Are U.K. Citizens Satisfied With E-Government Services? Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction. Information Systems Management. 2016. № 33(4). S. 331-343. DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singapore. Digital Government Blueprint [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: www.tech.gov.sg/digital-government-blueprint/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singapore. Digital Government Blueprint [Internet]. Available from: www.tech.gov.sg/digitalgovernment-blueprint/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Digital Government Index: 2019 results. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. 68 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Digital Government Index: 2019 results. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. 68 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванова М.В. Системы оценки цифровой трансформации государственного управления: сравнительный анализ российской и зарубежной практики // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2020. № 79. С. 246–270.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanova M.V. Systems for assessing the digital transformation of public administration: a comparative analysis of Russian and foreign practice. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik = Public Administration. Electronic bulletin. 2020; 79: 246-270. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Косарин С.П., Милькина И.В. Оценка отношения граждан России к процессам цифровизации государственных услуг // E-Management. 2019. Т. 2. № 4. С. 51–63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kosarin S.P., Mil’kina I.V. Assessment of the attitude of Russian citizens to the processes of digitalization of public services. E-Management. 2019; 2(4): 51-63. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rey-Moreno M., Felício J.A., MedinaMolina C., Rufín R. Facilitator and inhibitor factors: Adopting e-government in a dual model // Journal of Business Research. 2018. № 88. С. 542-549. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rey-Moreno M., Felício J.A., MedinaMolina C., Rufín R. Facilitator and inhibitor factors: Adopting e-government in a dual model. Journal of Business Research. 2018; 88: 542-549. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abu-Shanab E. Predicting trust in e-government: Two competing models // Electronic Government. 2019. № 15(2). С. 129–143. DOI: 10.1504/EG.2019.10015730.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abu-Shanab E. Predicting trust in e-government: Two competing models. Electronic Government. 2019; 15(2): 129-143. DOI: 10.1504/EG.2019.10015730.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Южаков В.Н., Добролюбова Е.И. Взаимодействие граждан с контрольно-надзорными органами государства: состояние и основные тенденции // Управленческое консультирование. 2020. № 11. C. 24–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yuzhakov V.N., Interaction of Citizens with Control and Supervisory Bodies of the State: State and Main Trends. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye = Management Consulting. 2020; 11: 24-42. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Федеральная служба государственной статистики [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/business/it/fed_nablcroc/index.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki = Federal State Statistics Service [Internet]. Available from: gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/business/it/fed_nabl-croc/index.html. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sanmukhiya C. Predicting e-government use in Mauritius: Non-parametric procedures // International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2019. № 8(2). С. 535-549. DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sanmukhiya C. Predicting e-government use in Mauritius: Non-parametric procedures. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2019; 8(2): 535-549. DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
